73

Tiger Flathead

Platycephalus richardsoni

  • Luke Maloney (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences)
  • Geoff Liggins (Department of Primary Industries, New South Wales)
  • James Andrews (Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Victoria)
  • Timothy Emery (Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania)
Toggle content

Stock Status Overview

Stock status determination
Jurisdiction Stock Fisheries Stock status Indicators
Commonwealth, New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania Southern Australia SESSF (CTS), SESSF (GHTS), OTF, ITF, SF Sustainable Spawning stock biomass, fishing mortality
ITF
Inshore Trawl Fishery (VIC)
OTF
Ocean Trawl Fishery (NSW)
SESSF (CTS)
Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (Commonwealth Trawl Sector) (CTH)
SESSF (GHTS)
Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (Gillnet Hook and Trap Sector) (CTH)
SF
Scalefish Fishery (TAS)
Toggle content

Stock Structure

Tiger Flathead is endemic to Australia and distributed from northern New South Wales to western Victoria, including Tasmanian waters. There is some evidence of regional differences in physical characteristics, growth rates and spawning periods for Tiger Flathead, but biological stock structure has not been studied using genetic techniques. A single biological stock structure is assumed for management purposes1.

Here, assessment of stock status is presented at the biological stock level—Southern Australian.

Toggle content

Stock Status

Southern Australia

Tiger Flathead is primarily caught by the Commonwealth managed Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery, which took an average of 92 per cent of the total landed catch over the past decade (2006–15), with small catches from New South Wales (six per cent), Tasmania (one per cent) and Victoria (less than one per cent). Stock status classification reported here is based on stock assessments conducted for the Commonwealth fishery, which include reported state catches.

The most recent assessment2 estimated spawning stock biomass in 2014 to be 50 per cent of the unfished (1915) level, above the target of 40 per cent and well above the spawning biomass that supports maximum sustainable yield, (estimated to be 32 per cent of the unfished biomass). This assessment determined that good recruitment since the late-1980s has maintained the stock near the target, allowing recent recommended biological catches (RBC) to be set above the long-term average. The stock is not considered to be recruitment overfished3.

The 2013 assessment also showed a notable increase in spawning biomass between 2010 and 20132. Based on this assessment the RBC for 1 year was estimated at 3428 tonnes (t) a 3-year RBC was estimated at 3334 t and a 5-year RBC was estimated at 3252 t4. In 2014, the Shelf Resource Assessment Group recommended that flathead be managed under a 3-year multi-total allowable catch. As the second year of a 3-year multi-TAC, the 2015–16 TAC for Tiger Flathead in the Commonwealth was set at 2860 t5. After addition of TAC undercatch from the previous season, the Commonwealth TAC for 2015–16 was set at 3092 t6. The Commonwealth catch in the 2015–16 fishing season was 2909 t, six per cent under the TAC. The total Australian commercial catch of Tiger Flathead in 2015 was 3052.5 t (2894 t Commonwealth; 129 t New South Wales; 28 t Tasmania; 1.5 t Victoria), below the 3-year RBC. This level of fishing pressure is unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished3.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the Southern Australian biological stock is classified as a sustainable stock.

Toggle content

Biology

Biology
Species Longevity / Maximum Size Maturity (50 per cent)
Tiger Flathead 20 years; males 500 mm TL , females 600 mm TL 3 years; 300 mm TL

Tiger Flathead biology7

Toggle content

Distributions

Distribution of reported commercial catch of Tiger Flathead

Toggle content

Tables

Fishing methods
Commonwealth New South Wales Victoria Tasmania
Commercial
Demersal Longline
Demersal Gillnet
Danish Seine
Otter Trawl
Hand Line, Hand Reel or Powered Reels
Various
Indigenous
Hand Line, Hand Reel or Powered Reels
Recreational
Hand Line, Hand Reel or Powered Reels
Management methods
Method Commonwealth New South Wales Victoria Tasmania
Commercial
Gear restrictions
Limited entry
Size limit
Spatial closures
Total allowable catch
Trip limits
Indigenous
Bag limits
Gear restrictions
Section 31 (1)(c1), Aboriginal cultural fishing authority
Size limit
Spatial closures
Recreational
Bag limits
Gear restrictions
Size limit
Spatial closures
Active vessels
Commonwealth New South Wales Victoria Tasmania
49 in SESSF (CTS) 33 in OTF 7 in ITF 16 in SF
ITF
Inshore Trawl Fishery (VIC)
OTF
Ocean Trawl Fishery (NSW)
SESSF (CTS)
Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (Commonwealth Trawl Sector) (CTH)
SF
Scalefish Fishery (TAS)
Catch
Commonwealth New South Wales Victoria Tasmania
Commercial 2.89Kt in SESSF (CTS), 6.23t in SESSF (GHTS) 128.72t in OTF 1.51t in ITF 28.10t in SF
Indigenous Unknown Unknown Unknown
Recreational 39 000 fish (2013–14) Unknown 12 t (2012–13)
ITF
Inshore Trawl Fishery (VIC)
OTF
Ocean Trawl Fishery (NSW)
SESSF (CTS)
Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (Commonwealth Trawl Sector) (CTH)
SESSF (GHTS)
Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (Gillnet Hook and Trap Sector) (CTH)
SF
Scalefish Fishery (TAS)

Commonwealtha New South Walesb Victoriab Tasmaniab Recreationalc,d Indigenousd–g

 

a Data provided for the Commonwealth align with the Commonwealth Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery 2015–16 fishing season (1 May 2015–30 April 2016).

b Data provided for New South Wales, Tasmania and Victoria align with the 2015 calendar year.

c The Australian Government does not manage recreational fishing in Commonwealth waters. Recreational fishing in Commonwealth waters is managed by the state or territory immediately adjacent to those waters, under its management regulations.

d In Victoria, regulations for managing recreational fishing are also applied to fishing activities by Indigenous people. Recognised Traditional Owners (groups that hold native title or have agreements under the Traditional Owner Settlement Act 2010 [Vic]) can apply for permits under the Fisheries Act 1995 (Vic) that authorise customary fishing (for example, different catch and size limits, or equipment). The Indigenous category in Table 3 refers to customary fishing undertaken by recognised Traditional Owners. In 2015, there were no applications for customary fishing permits to access Tiger Flathead.

e The Australian Government does not manage non-commercial Indigenous fishing in Commonwealth waters, with the exception of the Torres Strait. In general, non-commercial Indigenous fishing in Commonwealth waters is managed by the state or territory immediately adjacent to those waters.

f The Aboriginal Cultural Fishing Interim Access Arrangement allows an Aboriginal fisher in New South Wales to take in excess of a recreational bag limit in certain circumstances, for example, if they are doing so to provide fish to other community members who cannot harvest themselves.

g The Aboriginal cultural fishing authority is the authority that Indigenous persons can apply to take catches outside the recreational limits under the Fisheries Management Act 1994 (NSW), Section 37 (1)(c1), Aboriginal cultural fishing authority.

Toggle content

Catch Chart

Commercial catch of Tiger Flathead

Toggle content

Effects of fishing on the marine environment

  • There is bycatch in the fish trawl sector. In 2006, mandatory requirements for otter trawls to use 90 mm square-mesh codend panels were introduced in an effort to reduce the catch of small species and juvenile fish10.
  • Interactions also occur with animals protected under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, including marine mammals (dolphins, seals and sea lions), seabirds, some shark species and seahorses and pipefish (syngnathids). These interactions are reported quarterly by the Australian Fisheries Management Authority11 and on-board observer programs are used to validate the reporting in commercial logbooks.
  • In 2007, the South East Trawl Fishing Industry Association released an industry code of practice that aims to minimise interactions with fur seals, as well as addressing the environmental impacts of the fishery more generally12. Operators have developed other mitigation protocols that have further reduced seal mortalities, including: using breakaway ties that keep the net closed until it is below depths that seals regularly inhabit; adopting techniques to close the trawl opening during recovery to minimise opportunities for seals to enter the net; switching off gantry lights that are not required during night trawling to avoid attracting bait species and seals; and dumping offal only when the boat is not engaged in deploying or hauling gear12.
  • The Australian Fisheries Management Authority mandated individual vessel seabird management plans13. The seabird action plans are used in the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (Commonwealth Trawl Sector) (SESSF [CTS]) to mitigate the impacts of trawling on seabirds. From 1 May 2017, all vessels in the SESSF (CTS) and Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (Great Australian Bight Trawl Sector) (SESSF [GABTS]) fisheries must use one of the following mitigation devices: sprayers; bird bafflers; or pinkies with zero discharge of fish waste14.
  • The effects of trawl fishing on the marine environment are assessed through an environmental risk assessment and risk management framework and mitigated through spatial closures, and the implementation of bycatch and discard workplans in the SESSF (CTS) and SESSF (GABTS) fisheries.
  • Danish-seine and otter trawl gears interact with soft muddy or flat sandy substrates. An ecological risk assessment indicates that fishing operations on sandy substrates of the inner to mid shelf, where Tiger Flathead are targeted, do not present a high risk to habitats15,16.
  • Spiny Pipehorse can be taken as incidental bycatch in dredges, trawls, seines and crayfish pots17. An ecological risk assessment (ERA) into the effects of fishing from the Danish seine sub-fishery of the SESSF (CTS) indicated that the Spiny Pipehorse was at low risk because the fishery overlaps with only a small portion of the range of this species15. An ERA into the effects of fishing from the Otter trawl sub-fishery of the SESSF (CTS) considers the spiny pipehorse to be high risk because of high exposure to fishing (high proportion of range within the fishery, live in habitats that are likely to encounter the gear, and are the right size to be selected by the fishery)16.
  • Discarding of quota species can be significant in some parts of the Commonwealth Trawl Sector. However, discard rates for Tiger Flathead are low, generally around five per cent18.
Toggle content

Environmental effects on Tiger Flathead

  • There is some speculation that past peaks in abundance of Tiger Flathead may have been linked to favourable, but undetermined, environmental conditions19. Recent strong recruitment of Tiger Flathead may have a similar environmental basis. However, the effect of long-term shifts in the marine environment, such as those associated with global climate change, cannot yet be predicted for the Tiger Flathead biological stock.
Toggle content

References

  1. 1 Morison, AK, Knuckey, IA, Simpfendorfer, CA and Buckworth, RC 2013, South East Scalefish and Shark Fishery: stock assessment summaries for species assessed by GABRAG, ShelfRAG and Slope/DeepRAG, Report for the Australian Fisheries Management Authority, Canberra.
  2. 2 Day, J and Klaer, N 2014, Tiger flathead (Neoplatycephalus richardsoni) stock assessment based on data up to 2012–13, in GN Tuck (ed), Stock assessment for the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery 2013, Part 1, Australian Fisheries Management Authority and Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Marine Atmospheric Research, Hobart, pp 147–173.
  3. 3 Georgeson, L, Nicol, S, Moore, A and Green, R 2016, Commonwealth Trawl and Scalefish Hook sectors, in H Patterson, R Noriega, L Georgeson, I Stobutzki and R Curtotti (ed.s), Fishery status reports 2016, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Canberra.
  4. 4 Australian Fisheries Management Authority 2013, Species summaries for the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery: for stock assessments completed in 2013 in preparation for the 2014–15 fishing season, AFMA, Canberra.
  5. 5 Australian Fisheries Management Authority 2015, SESSF total allowable catch recommendations for the 2015–16 fishing year, AFMA, Canberra.
  6. 6 Australian Fisheries Management Authority 2016, AFMA Catchwatch report—Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery 2015, Australian Fisheries Management Authority, Canberra.
    http://www.afma.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/SESSF-2015-END-OF-SEASON-CATCH-V-TAC.pdf
  7. 7 Klaer, N 2010, Tiger Flathead (Neoplatycephalus richardsoni) stock assessment based on data up to 2009, Report to the Shelf Resource Assessment Group, Hobart.
  8. 8 West, LD, Stark, KE, Murphy, JJ, Lyle, JM and Ochwada-Doyle, FA 2015, Survey of recreational fishing in New South Wales and the ACT, 2013–14, Fisheries Final Report Series No. 149, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wollongong.
  9. 9 Lyle, JM, Stark, KE and Tracey, SR 2014, 2012–13 survey of recreational fishing in Tasmania, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart.
  10. 10 Australian Fisheries Management Authority 2005, SESSF direction no. 05: gear requirements for the Commonwealth Trawl Sector, AFMA, Canberra.
  11. 11 Australian Fisheries Management Authority, Protected species interaction reports, AFMA, Canberra.
  12. 12 South East Trawl Fishing Industry Association 2007, Industry code of practice to minimise interactions with seals, SETFIA, Shearwater, Tasmania.
  13. 13 Australian Fisheries Management Authority, Seabirds, AFMA, Canberra.
  14. 14 Australian Fisheries Management Authority 2016, AFMA moves to strengthen seabird safety, AFMA media release 15 July 2016.
  15. 15 Wayte, S, Bulman, C, Dowdney, J, Sporcic, M, Williams, A, Fuller, M and Smith, A 2007, Ecological risk assessment for the effects of fishing: report for the Danish seine sub-fishery of the Commonwealth Trawl Sector of the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery, Final report for the Australian Fisheries Management Authority R04/1072, AFMA, Canberra.
  16. 16 Wayte, S, Dowdney, J, Williams, A, Fuller, M, Bulman, C, Sporcic, M and Smith, A 2007, Ecological risk assessment for the effects of fishing: report for the otter trawl sub-fishery of the Commonwealth Trawl Sector of the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery, Final report for the Australian Fisheries Management Authority R04/1072, AFMA, Canberra.
  17. 17 Bray, DJ no date, Spiny Pipehorse, Solegnathus spinosissimus, in Fishes of Australia, Museums Victoria.
  18. 18 Upston, J and Thomson, R 2015, Integrated Scientific Monitoring Program for the Southern and Eastern Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery—discard estimation 2014, Australian Fisheries Management Authority and Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Marine Resources and Industries, Hobart.
  19. 19 Shelf Resource Assessment Group 2011, 2010 stock assessment summaries for species assessed by ShelfRAG, version 22, December 2010, Australian Fisheries Management Authority, Canberra.

Archived reports

Click the links below to view reports from other years for this fish.