Blacklip Abalone

Haliotis rubra rubra

  • Craig Mundy (Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania)
  • Ben Stobart (South Australian Research and Development Institute)
  • Corey Green (Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Victoria)
  • Greg Ferguson (South Australian Research and Development Institute)
  • Owen Burnell (South Australian Research and Development Institute)
  • Rowan Chick (Department of Primary Industries, New South Wales)
  • Stephen Mayfield (South Australian Research and Development Institute)
  • Anthony Hart (Department of Fisheries, Western Australia)

You are currently viewing a report filtered by jurisdiction. View the full report.

Toggle content

Stock Status Overview

Stock status determination
Jurisdiction Stock Fisheries Stock status Indicators
Victoria Victorian Central Zone Fishery VCZF Transitional-depleting Catch, CPUE, Fishery independent surveys
Victoria Victorian Eastern Zone Fishery VEZF Transitional-depleting Catch, CPUE, Fishery independent surveys
Victoria Victorian Western Zone Fishery VWZF Sustainable Catch, CPUE, Fishery independent surveys
Victorian Central Zone Fishery (VIC)
Victorian Eastern Zone Fishery (VIC)
Victorian Western Zone Fishery (VIC)
Toggle content

Stock Structure

Empirical field studies1 and molecular techniques2,3 strongly suggest Blacklip Abalone (Haliotis rubra rubra) fisheries comprise a large number of small, ecologically independent populations. Each biological stock may extend over only a few hundred metres, with each Blacklip Abalone fishery likely consisting of an indeterminate number of small biological stocks (populations), which may number in the thousands for a single fishery management unit. Given the large number of biological stocks, it is not practical to assess each stock separately.

Here, assessment of stock status is presented at the jurisdictional level—Western Australia; and at the management unit level (for each spatial quota management area)—New South Wales Abalone Fishery, Victorian Central Zone Fishery, Victorian Eastern Zone Fishery, Victorian Western Zone Fishery, Tasmanian Bass Strait Zone Fishery, Tasmanian Central Western Zone Fishery, Tasmanian Eastern Zone Fishery, Tasmanian Northern Zone Fishery, Tasmanian Western Zone Fishery, South Australian Central Zone Fishery, South Australian Southern Zone Fishery and South Australian Western Zone Fishery.

Toggle content

Stock Status

All states rely on empirical performance measures, specifically catch, catch per unit effort (CPUE; as kg of abalone harvested per hour), and commercial catch size structure. The annual catch in Blacklip Abalone fisheries is generally equivalent to the total allowable commercial catch (TACC) with negligible over-catch or under-catch of the TACC. In some jurisdictions, additional fishery-independent data (density, size structure) are available from underwater research surveys.


As the spatial extent of individual fishing events (dives4) or fishery-independent survey sites is approximately the same size as a functionally independent abalone population, and that habitat structure often changes on a similar spatial scale, the combination of these features make assessment of abalone stock status more complicated than most fisheries. Common values for catchability, recruitment, growth and natural mortality cannot be assumed for a management unit, and status of the many populations in a management unit should not be assumed to be trending in the same direction. Thus attempts to model a management unit as a single stock, or to use other methods to arrive at ‘global’ estimates of biomass should be approached cautiously. Catch rates are an index of local abundance only, that is, localised to each fishing event or to each survey site and local catch and catch rates do not inform status of more distant fishing grounds within the same management unit. Fishing effort in abalone fisheries is also subject to a range of influences (wave height and power, wind, currents, water clarity) creating short-term biases or variability in CPUE that are not related to resource abundance.


The New South Wales Abalone Fishery is managed as a single management unit with a single TACC, set by an independent Total Allowable Catch Committee. Annual assessments have relied heavily on fishery-dependent data from logbooks, including catch, catch rate (kg per hour) and mean weight, summarised at a range of spatial scales. Most recent assessments have also utilised estimates of legal size biomass density at fine spatial scales, derived from GPS data-loggers and data from logbooks.

The Victorian abalone fisheries are assessed using a weight-of-evidence approach, incorporating fishery-dependent commercial catch, effort, CPUE and length frequency data (from 1992 onwards), and fishery-independent fixed site surveys of abalone abundance and size structure. Trends in abalone abundance in two size classes are considered, using the legal minimum length (LML) established in 1992 (110 mm/120 mm Central Zone; 120 mm Eastern Zone, Western Zone)–density of abalone recruits (greater than the LML) and density of pre-recruits in a size band 40 mm below the LML. While fishery-independent survey data are available from 1992 onwards, data are only considered here from 2003–15, due to an increase in number of survey sites and other methodology changes introduced at this time, thus making it difficult to compare with data prior to 2003. The value of this fishery-independent survey is disputed by some sectors, although a recent review showed it to be broadly useful for determining relative stock status5. Commercial CPUE data and diver observations are evaluated at the scale of the management zones and at finer scales within each zone. Commercial CPUE data are used in both raw and standardised form6. Importantly, interpretation of these data is conducted within the context of historical changes in the management, fishing methods and other non-fishing impacts on the populations with each zone.


The Tasmanian abalone fishery has been quota managed with an annual TACC since 1985, and up to 1999 there was a single Tasmanian TACC that did not differentiate between species or area. In response to increased regional fishing pressure through the late-1990s, separate TACCs for Greenlip Abalone and Blacklip Abalone were implemented in 2000, and the Blacklip Abalone fishery was divided into two zones (Eastern Blacklip, Western Blacklip). Also in 2000, finer-scale reporting of fishing within sub-blocks was introduced. Further spatial partitioning of the Tasmanian Blacklip Abalone fishery occurred in 2001, with the northern areas of the Eastern and Western Zone moving into a Northern Blacklip Zone. In 2003, the Northern Zone was split into two zones with different size limits (Northern Blacklip and Bass Strait Blacklip). In 2009, the Western Blacklip Zone was split into Western Blacklip and Central West Blacklip zones, and the boundary between the Western and Central West Blacklip zones was moved northwards in 2013.

Around 65 per cent of the total Tasmanian wild abalone harvest is exported live to Asia, with the remaining fraction processed in canned or frozen form. The fishery lands abalone live, and all catch rates are in whole live weight.

An empirical harvest strategy (HS) was developed for the Tasmanian abalone fisheries in 2014–157,8 and tested by Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE)9,10. The HS was trialled in the Tasmanian abalone fishery assessment for the first time in 2015, jointly with the previous ad hoc approach4. The HS assesses the fishery performance against target reference points for three performance measures (PM) derived from standardised CPUE (SCPUE) data: current CPUE relative to an agreed target (55th percentile of the annual standardised mean CPUE within the reference period); the 4 year gradient of CPUE (target gradient is zero); and the per cent change in SCPUE in the past year (target change is zero). The reference period for the 2015 assessment spans fishery data between 1992 and 2015. A scoring function is applied to the three PMs resulting in a score between zero and 10, where five is the target PM value and zero and 10 are the zone-wide lowest and highest values for that PM within the reference period. Weightings are applied to the three PMs 05:0.25:02.5 to provide a combined final score used in the control rule. The HS is applied individually to each statistical reporting block, and a zone score is obtained from the mean block score weighted by block catch.

The zone target CPUE PM score is used as a proxy for biomass and the zone gradient CPUE PM score is used as a proxy for fishing mortality. A target CPUE score of one is the limit reference point (LRP) defining the boundary between recruitment overfished and transitional–depleting for all Tasmanian management units. This LRP is typically five per cent above the lowest SCPUE observed within the zone during the reference period. A negative zone gradient score gives evidence that fishing mortality is increasing and the magnitude of the gradient provides some information on the magnitude of fishing mortality. In order to emulate a normal phase plot, five is subtracted from the 4 year gradient PM score to provide a range of negative five–positive five, where the target reference point is zero, and defines the boundary between sustainable and transitional–depleting classifications, but also between transitional–recovering and recruitment overfished. The combination of a negative CPUE gradient and near-record low CPUE score represents a cautious proxy for the true recruitment overfished reference point. No reporting blocks have collapsed within the reference period, providing a degree of certainty that the LRP will prevent stock collapse, which is supported by MSE testing of the HS.

The Tasmanian Abalone Fishery Management Plan policy document requires size limits be established that allow two breeding seasons post-reproductive maturity. Research programs11 to obtain empirical data representing the geographic variability in growth rates and size at reproductive maturity have been underway since 1985, resulting in a range of LML regulations within the Tasmanian Blacklip Abalone fisheries ranging from 110–145 mm.


In South Australia, the harvest strategy in the Management Plan for the commercial abalone fishery12 produces a catch weighted determination of stock status for the fishing zone. However, the harvest strategy does not identify performance indicators or reference points for classifying the fishery under the Status of Australian Fish Stocks framework. The reference points described in the harvest strategy were developed as a scoring mechanism for the performance indicators, not as a stock classification tool. While there is some variability among management units, the harvest strategy was developed at a time when the fishery was considered to be stable and was partly designed to maintain that stability. Reference points are used to score performance indicators, with negative scores for low current values and positive scores for high current values, when assessed against a fixed 20-year reference period (1990–2009). The intent was to prevent the fishery declining to abundance levels in the 1990s, that preceded the large increase in abundance (presumably through strong recruitment) in the 2000s13,14, whilst simultaneously allowing increased abundance to translate to elevated TACCs. The harvest strategy appears to result in more optimistic assessments of stock status than those from weight-of-evidence methods applied elsewhere13,14. Concerns with the harvest strategy have resulted in a review that is currently underway. Consequently, in this assessment, nominal commercial catch rates (CPUE based on: meat weight in the Central and Western Zone management units; and shell [whole] weight in the Southern Zone management unit) are used as the primary index of relative Blacklip Abalone abundance. CPUE can provide a more optimistic index of relative abundance than measures from fishery-independent surveys, because catch rates in dive fisheries have been shown to be hyperstable13–18. Decreases in CPUE in abalone fisheries are considered to be a reliable indicator of declines in abalone abundance, but nominal CPUE can underestimate the actual magnitude of the reduction in harvestable biomass13–18.

Victorian Central Zone Fishery

Consistent among all Victorian management units, unstandardised commercial CPUE increased from about 65 kg per hour in the mid- to late-1990s to about 100 kg per hour in the early-2000s, with the increase thought to be influenced by changes in fishing practices that improved fishing efficiency21. CPUE peaked in the early-2000s at close to 100 kg per hour, but has shown a declining trend since, and in 2014–15 was at approximately 75 kg per hour and 75 per cent of the 2001 peak. This decline is of concern, however, the management unit is not considered to be recruitment overfished because the current CPUE is above 1992–93 levels, from which recovery was seen in the past. While some of the variation in CPUE since 2001 may be attributed to changes in LML and industry imposed size limits greater than the LML for individual reefs, declining CPUE trends have been observed since 2001 across most sub-zonal management units. The abalone viral ganglioneuritis (AVG) outbreak in the far west of the zone probably contributed to declining catches and catch rates, but the impacts were considered minor.

The TACC was reduced substantially from 620 t in 2006–07 to 285 t in 2010–11, and has since ranged from 279–307.7 t. TACCs have closely reflected the catch.

Trends in fishery-independent survey data were consistent with a decline in CPUE, showing a major decline in 2003–09 in the pre-recruit and recruit abundance indices (number/transect) of approximately 60 per cent and 55 per cent, respectively. Since 2009, the survey index of recruit abundance has been stable, while the pre-recruit index has continued to decline at a lower rate. In 2015, the pre-recruit abundance index was at approximately 25 per cent of that measured in 2003 and 2004, although it is not yet clear whether this represents an overfished stock.

While fishing pressure was reduced through progressive decreases in the TACC of about 50 per cent from 2003–04 to 2010–11, more recently (with the exception of 2013–14), TACCs have been higher than in 2010–11 by between 13 and 47 t. This is despite the stable, but relatively low, levels of commercial CPUE and fishery-independent survey indices. The above weight of evidence indicates that the current level of fishing pressure is likely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the Victorian Central Zone Fishery management unit is classified as a transitional–depleting stock.

Victorian Eastern Zone Fishery

The Eastern Zone management unit was not affected by AVG, but has seen impacts from environmental and ecosystem changes such as range expansion by the Long Spined Sea Urchin (Centrostephanus rodgersii)22. These urchins denude reefs of macro-algae, turning the reefs into ‘barrens’ that are unsuitable for abalone. Significant areas of reef in the Eastern Zone have been rendered unsuitable for abalone due to urchin expansion over the past 20 years22. This has led to increased fishing effort on urchin-free reef areas, with increased risk of localised depletion. Improvements in fishing methods have also occurred in this zone, and are thought to have caused fishing efficiency-related increases in CPUE from the mid-1990s–early-2000s.

Commercial CPUE (standardised) increased from about 70 kg per hour in 1992 to peak levels of about 120 kg per hour in 2011–1223. However, from 2011–15 CPUE declined by 20 per cent. Similarly, most sub-zonal management units have shown declines in CPUE in recent years. These declines are of concern, however, the management unit is not currently considered to be overfished because the CPUE suggests that biomass is now close to 2004-05 levels (100 kg per hour), from which recovery was seen in the past. This catch rate is also considered to be above levels observed in other abalone fisheries where stocks are not considered overfished.

The fishery-independent survey indices show relatively stable pre-recruit abundance from 2003–09, after which pre-recruit abundance declined by approximately 40 per cent, until 2014. The last few years of the pre-recruit survey index have been stable at 2014 levels. From 2003–08, the survey index of recruit abundance declined by approximately 55 per cent, and has also remained steady over the past 4 years.

In response to declining CPUE and survey indices, there has been an incremental reduction of TACCs since 2008–09, from 490 t in that year to 417 t in 2014–15. While there are signs of recent stability in the pre-recruit and recruit survey indices, it is too soon to tell whether this stability will continue, or if the current management arrangements and quota reductions are sufficient for preventing further decline and allowing the stock to rebuild. The recent declines in CPUE across much of the zone are concerning, as is the ongoing vulnerability of the zone to further habitat loss from urchins. The evidence indicates that biomass is declining in the zone, but this has been from historically high levels and it is not yet considered to be an overfished stock.

The above weight of evidence indicates that the current level of fishing pressure, combined with possible further impacts of increased habitat loss from urchins, is likely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the Victorian Eastern Zone Fishery management unit is classified as a transitional–depleting stock.

Victorian Western Zone Fishery

The western zone management unit has undergone significant changes over its recent history. Most notable was the impact of the outbreak AVG in 2006. Mortalities due to this disease severely reduced the biomass and resulted in a major reduction in TACC for this zone from 280 t in 2001–02 to 20 t in 2008–09. While some fishing occurred on uninfected reefs for a period immediately after the disease was first recognised, by 2008 most areas in the Western Zone had been impacted and/or were closed to fishing. These events complicate the comparison of recent and historical fishery-dependent and independent data.

Progression of the disease through the fishery had abated by 2009, enabling fishers and researchers to conduct a structured fishing program24 to gather information and assess capacity of remaining stocks to support a viable commercial fishery. Under this program, divers were assigned fishing areas, some of which were seldom fished in the past. In some cases, harvest on disease free reefs was initially set at zero to insure the maintenance of some healthy animals. From 2011 onwards, most reef areas were again open to fishing and ‘normal’ fishing practices resumed under a much reduced quota of 53 t and a higher LML (130 mm) than pre-AVG. Only trends in commercial CPUE from 2011 onwards are used in this assessment, due to the large changes that occurred prior to this. While there has been no formalised rebuilding strategy, fishing has been kept low by a precautionary TACC level set at approximately 50 t (or 10 per cent of estimated available biomass)25–27. Estimating available biomass involves the use of survey data to determine abalone density, converting numbers to biomass using length to weight relationships, and scaling the biomass estimates by the area of the fishing grounds27.

Commercial CPUE for the management unit as a whole increased from 1992–2001, a period influenced by changes in fishing practice and the adoption of improved technology–both of which led to increased efficiency of the fleet. CPUE from 2001–05 declined slightly, until the 2006 AVG outbreak, resulting in substantial declines in catch and catch rate. After ‘normal’ fishing practices were resumed in 2011, CPUE increased until 2013, possibly due to fishers being able to target the more productive reefs again after the structured fishing ended. Since 2013, CPUE has stabilised at approximately 70 kg per hour across the zone compared to approximately 90 kg per hour during the 1990s and early-2000s, prior to AVG impacts. The current catch rate is evidence that the biomass is at a level comparable with stocks in other management units (for example, the Victorian Central Zone) which are not considered to be recruitment overfished. Since 2011, the TACCs have been reflected by the catch.

The fishery-independent survey data from 2003 onwards clearly show the impact of the AVG mortalities, with declines in the survey abundance indices (number/transect) for both pre-recruits and recruits of approximately 80 per cent and 40 per cent respectively from 2003–09. From 2009 onwards, both survey indices have been stable through to 2015, although the pre-recruit survey index has remained at about 30 per cent of that recorded prior to disease in 2003, while the recruit survey index is at approximately 70 per cent of that measured in 2003. The above evidence indicates that the biomass of the stock is unlikely to be recruitment overfished, as long as the AVG did not disrupt the fundamental breeding and juvenile recruitment processes.

The fishery-dependent and independent information indicate that the management unit has been stable since 2011, but at a much lower biomass than pre-AVG. The recent stability of the commercial CPUE under the higher LML, combined with stability of the fishery-independent pre-recruit and recruit survey indices, suggest that the current management arrangements restricting fishing pressure are not causing further decline. The management unit is not, however, substantially rebuilding. The above evidence indicates that the current level of fishing pressure is unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the Victorian Western Zone Fishery management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.

Toggle content


Blacklip Abalone biology

Species Longevity / Maximum Size Maturity (50 per cent)
Blacklip Abalone 20–50 years; 150–220 mm SL  ~ 5 years; 80–130 mm SL 
Toggle content


Distribution of reported commercial catch of Blacklip Abalone

Toggle content


Fishing methods
Management methods
Method Victoria
Limited entry
Size limit
Spatial closures
Total allowable catch
Bag limits
Size limit
Bag limits
Size limit
Active vessels
22 in VCZF, 17 in VEZF, 7 in VWZF
Victorian Central Zone Fishery (VIC)
Victorian Eastern Zone Fishery (VIC)
Victorian Western Zone Fishery (VIC)
Commercial 324.89t in VCZF, 384.54t in VEZF, 58.11t in VWZF
Indigenous Zero
Recreational Unknown
Victorian Central Zone Fishery (VIC)
Victorian Eastern Zone Fishery (VIC)
Victorian Western Zone Fishery (VIC)

a Victoria – Indigenous (management methods) In Victoria, managing fishing activities by Indigenous people is grouped with the recreational fishing sector. Recognised Traditional Owners (groups that hold native title or have agreements under the Traditional Owner Settlement Act 2010 [Vic]) can apply for permits under the Fisheries Act 1995 (Vic) that authorise customary fishing (for example, different catch and size limits or equipment). The Indigenous category in Table 3 has been interpreted to mean customary fishing being undertaken by Recognised Traditional Owners.
b New South Wales – Indigenous (management methods) Aboriginal Cultural Fishing Interim Access Arrangement - allows an Indigenous fisher in New South Wales to take in excess of a recreational bag limit in certain circumstances, for example, if they are doing so to provide fish to other community members who cannot harvest themselves.
c New South Wales – Indigenous Aboriginal cultural fishing authority - the authority that Indigenous persons can apply to take catches outside the recreational limits under the Fisheries Management Act 1994 (NSW), Section 37 (1)(c1), Aboriginal cultural fishing authority.

Toggle content

Catch Chart

Commercial catch of Blacklip Abalone - note confidential catch not shown

Toggle content

Effects of fishing on the marine environment

  • Blacklip Abalone are hand-selected by divers operating from vessels that seldom anchor, hence the fishery has negligible direct physical impact on the environment. There is also substantial evidence that the ecosystem effects of removing abalone are minimal34–36.
Toggle content

Environmental effects on Blacklip Abalone

  • AVG established in the wild fishery following initial infection in two land-based abalone aquaculture farms and two offshore experimental farms adjacent to the wild fishery in 200524. AVG is highly pathogenic, resulting in estimated mortalities of between 60 and 95 per cent in infected wild populations.
  • South and westward strengthening of the relatively oligotrophic East Australian Current37 into the inshore waters in eastern Victoria and Tasmania is thought to have triggered changes in nearshore community structure over the past two decades38. This is primarily through range expansion of species such as the Long Spined Sea Urchin (Centrostephanus rodgersii) from New South Wales to Tasmania and Victoria, and the significant reduction in Giant Kelp (Macrocystis porifera) biomass39. This has resulted in localised depletions of abalone populations and a reduction in the habitat available for abalone40.
  • Above average warm water events were inferred to have resulted in minor mortalities of abalone in Tasmania in February 2010 (pers. comm., Tasmanian Abalone Divers), although the spatial extent and magnitude of the mortality was not quantified. These events are expected to increase under most climate change scenarios.
Toggle content


  1. 1 Prince JD, Sellers TL, Ford WB, Talbot SR. 1987, Experimental-Evidence for Limited Dispersal of Haliotid Larvae (Genus Haliotis, Mollusca, Gastropoda). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 1987; 106: 243–263. .
  2. 2 Miller KJ, Maynard BT, Mundy CN. 2009, Genetic diversity and gene flow in collapsed and healthy abalone fisheries. Molecular Ecology 2009; 18: 200–211. .
  3. 3 Temby N, Miller K, Mundy C. 2007, Evidence of genetic subdivision among populations of blacklip abalone (Haliotis rubra Leach) in Tasmania. Marine and Freshwater Research 2007; 58: 733–742. .
  4. 4 Mundy C, Jones HJ. 2016, Tasmanian Abalone Fishery Assessment 2015. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies Report. University of Tasmania, Hobart.
  5. 5 Hart. 2016, Review of fixed site surveys used by the Victorian abalone science program. Western Australian Department of Fisheries.
  6. 6 Gorfine H, Taylor B, Smith DC. 2002, Abalone – 2001, Fisheries Victoria Assessment Report No 43. Marine and Freshwater Resources Institute, Queenscliff.
  7. 7 Buxton CD, Cartright I, Dichmont C, Mayfield S, Plaganyi EE. 2015, Review of the Harvest Strategy and MCDA process for the Tasmanian Abalone Fishery. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies.
  8. 8 Mundy C, Jones HJ. 2016, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis based harvest strategy for the Tasmanian abalone fishery. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Hobart.
  9. 9 Haddon M, Mundy C. 2016, Testing abalone empirical harvest strategies, for setting TACs and associated LMLs, that include the use of novel spatially explicit performance measures. CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Hobart.
  10. 10 Haddon M, Mayfield S, Helidoniotis F, Chick R, Mundy C. 2014, Identification and Evaluation of Performance Indicators for Abalone Fisheries. FRDC Final Report 2007/020. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Hobart
  11. 11 Jones HJ, Pyke S, Mundy C. 2016, Review of Size at Maturity and Legal Minimum Length in Tasmanian Blacklip Abalone Fisheries. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies Report. University of Tasmania, Hobart.
  12. 12 PIRSA. 2012, Management Plan for the South Australian commercial abalone fishery. 2012. .
  13. 13 Burnell O, Mayfield S, Ferguson G, Carroll J. 2016, Central Zone Abalone (Haliotis laevigata & H. rubra) Fishery. Fishery Assessment Report for PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture. 2016.
  14. 14 Stobart B, Mayfield S. 2016, Status of the Western Zone Blacklip Abalone (Haliotis rubra) fishery in 2015. Report for PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture. 2016. .
  15. 15 Dowling NA, Hall SJ, McGarvey R. 2004, Assessing population sustainability and response to fishing in terms of aggregation structure for greenlip abalone (Haliotis laevigata) fishery management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 2004; 61: 247–259.
  16. 16 Stobart B, Mayfield S. 2016, Assessment of the Western Zone greenlip abalone (Haliotis laevigata) Fishery in 2015. Fishery Stock Assessment Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture. 2016. .
  17. 17 Tarbath D, Mundy C, Gardner C. 2014, Tasmanian Abalone Fishery Assessment 2013. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies .
  18. 18 Shephard S, Rodda KR. 2001, Sustainability demands vigilance: Evidence for serial decline of the greenlip abalone fishery and a review of management. 2001; 20: 829–841. .
  19. 19 Anon. 2015, Total Allowable Catch Committee Report and Determination for 2016 – Abalone Fishery 2015. New South Wales Government.
  20. 20 Liggins G, Upston J. 2010, Investigating and managing the Perkinsus-related mortality of Blacklip Abalone in NSW. 2010. .
  21. 21 DEDJTR. 2016, Victorian Abalone Stock Assessment – Central Zone. Fisheries Victoria.
  22. 22 Gorfine H, Bell J, Mills K, Lewis Z. 2012, Removing sea urchins (Centrostephanus rodgersii) to recover abalone (Haliotis rubra) habitat. Department of Primary Industries, Queenscliff, Victoria, Australia.
  23. 23 DEDJTR. 2016, Victorian Abalone Stock Assessment – Eastern Zone. Fisheries Victoria.
  24. 24 Mayfield S, McGarvey R, Gorfine HK, Peeters H, Burch P, Sharma S. 2011, Survey estimates of fishable biomass following a mass mortality in an Australian molluscan fishery. Journal of Fish Diseases 2011; 34: 287–302. .
  25. 25 Helidoniotis F, Haddon M. 2014, Modelling the potential for recovery of Western Victorian abalone stocks: The Crags. Interim Report to 2012/225. CSIRO, Hobart.
  26. 26 Gorfine H, Day R, Bardos D, Taylor B, Prince J, Sainsbury K et al. 2008, Rapid response to abalone virus depletion in western Victoria: information acquisition and reefcode assessment, final report to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, project 2007-066. The University of Melbourne .
  27. 27 WADA. 2016, Assessment of abalone stocks in Western Zone, Victoria: Submission to the TAC setting process for 2017 November 2016. WADA.
  28. 28 Tarbath D, Mundy C. 2015, Tasmanian Abalone Fishery Assessment 2014. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Science, University of Tasmania .
  29. 29 Tarbath D, Mundy C. 2004, Tasmanian Abalone Fishery 2003. Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisherieis Institute .
  30. 30 Tarbath D, Gardner C. 2011, Tasmanian Abalone Fishery Assessment 2010. Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute .
  31. 31 Jones C H. J. Tarbath D. Gardner. 2014, Could harvest from abalone stocks be increased through better management of the size limit/quota interaction? Australian Seafood Cooperative Research Centre, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania .
  32. 32 Ferguson G, Mayfield S. 2016, Status of the Southern Zone blacklip (Haliotis rubra) and greenlip (H. laevigata) abalone fisheries in 2014/15. Report for PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture. 2016.
  33. 33 Lyle JM, Tracey SR. 2016, Tasmanian Recreational Rock Lobster and Abalone Fisheries: 2014-2015 Fishing Season. 2016. .
  34. 34 Jenkins GP. 2004, The ecosystem effects of abalone fishing: a review. Marine and Freshwater Research 2004; 55: 545–552.
  35. 35 Valentine JP, Tarbath DB, Frusher SD, Mundy CN, Buxton CD. 2010, Limited evidence for ecosystem-level change on reefs exposed to Haliotis rubra (“blacklip abalone”) exploitation. Austral Ecology 2010; 35: 806–817. .
  36. 36 Hamer PA, Jenkins G, Womersley BA, Mills KA. 2010, Understanding the ecological role of abalone in the reef ecosystem of Victoria. Final report to Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. Project No. 2006/040. 2010. .
  37. 37 Ridgway KR. 2007, Long-term trend and decadal variability of the southward penetration of the East Australian Current. Geophysical Research Letters 2007; 34. .
  38. 38 Johnson CR, Banks SC, Barrett NS, Cazassus F, Dunstan PK, Edgar GJ et al. 2011, Climate change cascades: Shifts in oceanography, species’ ranges and subtidal marine community dynamics in eastern Tasmania. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 2011; 400: 17–32. .
  39. 39 Ling SD, C.R. J, K. R, Hobday A, Haddon M. 2009, Climate-driven range extension of a sea urchin: inferring future trends by analysis of recent population dynamics. Global Change Biology 2009; 15: 719–731. .
  40. 40 Strain EMA, Johnson CR. 2009, Competition between an invasive urchin and commercially fished abalone: effect on body condition, reproduction and survivorship. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2009; 377: 169–182.

Archived reports

Click the links below to view reports from other years for this fish.