Commercial Scallop

Pecten fumatus

  • Jayson Semmens (Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania)
  • Corey Green (Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Victoria)
  • Nic Marton (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences)

You are currently viewing a report filtered by jurisdiction. View the full report.

Toggle content

Stock Status Overview

Stock status determination
Jurisdiction Stock Fisheries Stock status Indicators
Tasmania Tasmanian Scallop Fishery TSF Undefined Biomass surveys, size composition, catch
Tasmanian Scallop Fishery (TAS)
Toggle content

Stock Structure

There are several Commercial Scallop beds fished commercially in Commonwealth, Victorian and Tasmanian waters. These beds often contain different age classes of scallop and most have been fished at some stage in the past. Commercial Scallops in Port Phillip Bay (Victoria) are genetically distinct from those in the D’Entrecasteaux Channel (Tasmania), and also differ from conspecifics in most other locations in south eastern Australia1,2. The genetic structure of Commercial Scallops in Bass Strait is complex and unclear2,3.

Here, assessment of stock status is reported at the management unit level—Bass Strait Central Zone Scallop Fishery (Commonwealth), Ocean Scallop Fishery (Victoria), Port Phillip Bay Dive Scallop Fishery (Victoria) and Tasmanian Scallop Fishery.

Toggle content

Stock Status

Many scallop fisheries have experienced repeated ‘boom and bust’ phases, with declines often resulting in prolonged fishery closures. Management arrangements for the three jurisdictions that harvest Commercial Scallop in Australian waters all include a minimum size limit (to allow adult scallops to spawn several times before harvest) and some means of capping fishing effort (through spatial and/or temporal closures) and overall catch (through a total allowable catch [TAC]). Estimating Commercial Scallop biomass by means of surveys is complicated by unpredictable and highly variable recruitment, which can result in scallops declining in one area and reappearing in another4.

Tasmanian Scallop Fishery

The harvest of Commercial Scallop in Tasmania waters is regulated through a minimum size limit of 90 mm SL; animals of this size are approximately 3+ years of age and have spawned at least twice18.

The Tasmanian Scallop Fishery is managed under a harvest strategy where surveys are undertaken to estimate abundance and decision rules are used to open an area (or areas) to fishing. Similar to the Commonwealth fishery, these decision rules include a minimum size limit and a maximum discard rate (which is not to exceed 20 per cent). However, unlike the Bass Strait Central Zone Scallop Fishery (Commonwealth) (BSCZSF), there is no requirement to close a proportion of the beds found during surveys. Instead, protection of scallops (and scallop habitat) is afforded through a ban on dredging in waters less than 20 m and a network of dredge-prohibited areas around the state.

The Tasmanian fishery was closed to fishing in 2009–10 due to apparent low abundance and small average sizes (below the minimum size). In 2013, 2014 and 2015, industry surveys generally found low scallop densities and limited evidence of successful recent recruitment, but did identify two beds (one on the north-west coast and the other on the east coast) containing commercial quantities that met the harvest strategy guidelines.

These areas were subsequently opened to fishing each year between 2013 and 2015. A lower minimum size limit (85 mm SL) was applied to the north-west bed given the historically slow growth rates in this region and the fact that most scallops of this size are still 3+ years old18. A voluntary industry closure was implemented in July 2013 for a portion of the east coast bed when a large aggregation of immature scallops was discovered in the northern section of the fishing area.

By the end of 2013, 1226 t (82 per cent) of the 1489 t TAC had been harvested. In 2014, only 489 t (39 per cent) of the 1240 t TAC was taken, with 404 t coming from the north-west bed, which had average scallop densities of almost twice those of the east coast bed when surveyed. In 2015, 781 t (76 per cent) of the 1033 t TAC was taken, with 717 t coming from the east coast bed, which had average scallop densities of almost twice those of the north-west bed when surveyed.

Estimates of Commercial Scallop abundance in the BSCZSF have been significantly greater than those for the Tasmanian fishery for the period 2014–16. The majority of licensees in the Tasmanian fishery also operate in the Commonwealth fishery. As such, some of the uncaught TAC in the Tasmanian fishery may be a result of operators choosing to fish in Commonwealth waters, where scallops were more abundant.

Given the more abundant resource in the BSCZSF, industry state-wide surveys were only conducted within two known scallop beds on the state’s east coast in 2016, with no current knowledge of the status of beds elsewhere in the state. The surveys generally only found low levels of scallop abundance and limited evidence of successful recruitment, with no area considered to contain commercially viable quantities. This included the east coast bed fished in 2015, which appeared to have been fished down to a commercially unviable density, with no subsequent recruitment evident. However, there is a known bed of scallops adjacent to this fished bed that is in a dredge-prohibited area, and is likely part of the commercial bed that has been fished between 2013–15; that is, the line demarcating the dredge-prohibited area dissects the bed. Furthermore, the closure dissects the bed where the abundance is greatest. There is currently no knowledge of the status of scallop beds in other dredge-prohibited areas or in waters less than 20 m around the state.

In addition to the above conflicting indicators, there is a lack of information about the majority of the fishery area, including areas previously fished. There is insufficient evidence to confidently classify the status of this stock.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the Tasmanian Scallop Fishery management unit is classified as an undefined stock.

Toggle content


Commercial Scallop biology1–3,18

Species Longevity / Maximum Size Maturity (50 per cent)
Commercial Scallop 7+ years; > 120 mm SH  SHell length  2 years; 70–80 mm SL, depending on region
Toggle content


Distribution of reported commercial catch of Commercial Scallop

Toggle content


Fishing methods
Management methods
Method Tasmania
Gear restrictions
Limited entry
Size limit
Spatial closures
Temporal closures
Total allowable catch
Bag limits
Size limit
Spatial closures
Temporal closures
Active vessels
8 in TSF
Tasmanian Scallop Fishery (TAS)
Commercial 781.17t in TSF
Indigenous Unknown
Recreational Unknown
Tasmanian Scallop Fishery (TAS)

a Victoria – Commercial In Victoria, the reporting period is fishing season, which runs from 1 April–30 March.
b Victoria – Indigenous (management methods) In Victoria, regulations for managing recreational fishing are also applied to fishing activities by Indigenous people. Recognised Traditional Owners (groups that hold native title or have agreements under the Traditional Owner Settlement Act 2010 [Vic]) are exempt (subject to conditions) from the requirement to hold a recreational fishing licence, and can apply for permits under the Fisheries Act 1995 (Vic) that authorise customary fishing (for example, different catch and size limits or equipment). The Indigenous category in Table 3 refers to customary fishing undertaken by recognised Traditional Owners. In 2015, there were no applications for customary fishing permits to access Commercial Scallop.
c Victoria – Indigenous (management methods) Subject to the defence that applies under Section 211 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), and the exemption from a requirement to hold a Victorian recreational fishing licence, the non-commercial take by indigenous fishers is covered by the same arrangements as that for recreational fishing.
d Victoria – Commercial (catch) To protect commercial confidentiality of data, the catch in the Ocean Scallop Fishery (Victoria) and Port Phillip Bay Dive Scallop Fishery (Victoria) cannot be reported because there are fewer than five licence holders.

Toggle content

Catch Chart

Commercial catch of Commercial Scallop - note confidential catch not shown.

Toggle content

Effects of fishing on the marine environment

  • Commercial Scallops have been fished within the same regions repeatedly since the 1960s19, and the current impacts of dredging activities are considered less significant than those when the fishery began. This is because the long-term dredge fishery may have already resulted in benthic communities shifting in favour of those species that are less susceptible to dredging, or those most able to quickly recover20-22. Scallops are targeted where they are abundant and the effect on other species within the broader ecosystem tends to be minimal2, 23. An ecological risk assessment of the Bass Strait Central Zone Scallop Fishery found that none of the habitats assessed were at high risk24. Commercial Scallops, and associated benthic communities, are impacted by dredging over relatively brief periods of time and generally recover quickly25,26.
  • Selective harvesting by the Port Phillip Scallop Dive Fishery has minimal impact on the surrounding environment and other fisheries15. It is difficult to identify any scenario where this dive fishery would have a detrimental impact on the local snapper fishery27.
Toggle content

Environmental effects on Commercial Scallop

  • Changes in Commercial Scallop community structure can be driven more by environmental effects than fishing25. Recruitment of Commercial Scallops is sporadic, intermittent and poorly understood4. Natural mortality of scallops is highly variable and depends on factors including (but not limited to) density-dependent food shortages, seabed bottom type, disease, environmental conditions and predation28. Stock relationships are heavily influenced by ocean currents2. Climate change-induced changes in ocean currents and/or upwelling events are expected to affect recruitment. Recent research has shown that seismic surveying may impact the health and increase the mortality rate of scallops29.
Toggle content


  1. 1 Woodburn, L 1990, Genetic variation in southern Australian Pecten, in Proceedings of the Australasian Scallop Workshop. Tasmanian Government: Hobart.
  2. 2 Semmens, JM, et al 2015, Establishing fine-scale industry based spatial management and harvest strategies for the Commercial Scallop fishery in South East Australia, final report to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, project 2008/022. FRDC: Canberra.
  3. 3 Ovenden, JR, et al. 2016, Stirred but not shaken: population and recruitment genetics of the scallop (Pecten fumatus) in Bass Strait, Australia. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil.
  4. 4 Peterson, CH, Summerson, HC and Fegley, SR 1988, Ecological consequences of mechanical harvesting of clams. Fishery Bulletin, 85(2): p. 281-298.
  5. 5 Australian Fisheries Management Authority 2007, Harvest strategy for the Bass Strait Central Zone Scallop Fishery. Australian Fisheries Management Authority: Canberra.
  6. 6 Australian Fisheries Management Authority 2012, Harvest strategy for the Bass Strait Central Zone Scallop Fishery. Australian Fisheries Management Authority: Canberra.
  7. 7 Australian Fisheries Management Authority 2014, Harvest Strategy for the Bass Strait Central Zone Scallop Fishery. Australian Fisheries Management Authority: Canberra.
  8. 8 Australian Fisheries Management Authority 2015, Harvest Strategy for the Bass Strait Central Zone Scallop Fishery. Australian Fisheries Management Authority: Canberra.
  9. 9 Australian Fisheries Management Authority 2015, Bass Strait Central Zone Scallop Fishery Resource Assessment Group (ScallopRAG) Meeting 23, Meeting Minutes; Date: 2 March 2015. AFMA: Canberra.
  10. 10 Knuckey, I, Koopman, M and Davis, M 2015, Bass Strait and Central Zone Scallop Fishery — 2015 Survey, project 2015/001291. Australian Fisheries Management Authority: Canberra.
  11. 11 Knuckey, I, Koopman, M and Davis, M 2016, Bass Strait and Central Zone Scallop Fishery – 2016 Survey, project 2016/0804. Australian Fisheries Management Authority: Canberra.
  12. 12 Harrington, J, Leporati, S and Semmens, JM 2010, 2009 Victorian Scallop Fishery Survey, final report to Fisheries Victoria. Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania: Hobart.
  13. 13 Semmens, JM and Jones, N 2012, Victorian scallop fishery survey final report. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania: Hobart.
  14. 14 DEPI 2014, Commercial Scallop Dive Fishery (Port Phillip) – Survey Results for 2014. Fisheries Victoria: Melbourne
  15. 15 DEDJTR 2016, Draft Port Phillip Scallop Dive Fishery Management Plan. Fisheries Victoria: Melbourne.
  16. 16 DEPI 2013, Commercial Scallop Dive Fishery (Port Phillip Bay) Baseline Management Arrangements. Fisheries Victoria: Melbourne.
  17. 17 Henry, GW and Lyle, JM 2003, The National Recreational and Indigenous Fishing Survey - project 99/158 FRDC: Canberra.
  18. 18 Young, P and Martin, R 1989, The scallop fisheries of Australia and their management. Reviews in Aquatic Sciences, 1(4): p. 615-638.
  19. 19 Gwyther, D, et al. 1991, Fisheries and Aquaculture: Australia, in Scallops: Biology, Ecology and Aquaculture, Editors: Shumway, SL and Parsons, GJ. Elsevier: New York.
  20. 20 Jennings, S and Kaiser, MJ 1998, The Effects of Fishing on Marine Ecosystems, in Advances in Marine Biology, Editors: Blaxter, JHS, Southward, AJS and Tyler PA. Academic Press. p. 201-352.
  21. 21 Kaiser, MJ, et al. 2002, Modification of marine habitats by trawling activities: prognosis and solutions. Fish and Fisheries, 3(2): p. 114-136.
  22. 22 Young, P, et al. 1988, Variability in spatfall and recruitment of commercial scallops (Pecten fumatus) in Bass Strait, in Proceedings of the Australian Scallop Workshop. Tasmanian Government: Hobart.
  23. 23 Haddon, M, Harrington, J and Semmens, JM 2006, Juvenile scallop discard rates and bed dynamics: testing the management rules for scallops in Bass Strait, final report to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, project 2003/017. FRDC: Canberra.
  24. 24 Hobday, A, et al. 2007, Ecological risk assessment for the effects of fishing: Bass Strait Central Zone Scallop Sub-Fishery, report to the Australian Fisheries Management Authority. Australian Fisheries Management Authority: Canberra.
  25. 25 Currie, DR and Parry, GD 1999, Impacts and efficiency of scallop dredging on different soft substrates. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 56(4): p. 539-550.
  26. 26 Harrington, J, Haddon, M and Semmens, JM 2008, Facilitating industry self-management for spatially managed stocks: A scallop case study, final report to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, project 2005/027. FRDC: Canberra.
  27. 27 Kennelly, S 2013, Review of potential interactions between snapper and the proposed commercial scallop dive fishery in Port Phillip Bay. Fisheries Victoria: Melbourne.
  28. 28 Gwyther, D and McShane, PE 1988, Growth rate and natural mortality of the scallop Pecten alba tate in Port Phillip Bay, Australia, and evidence for changes in growth rate after a 20-year period. Fisheries Research, 6(4): p. 347-361.
  29. 29 Ryan D. Day, RD, McCauley, RD, Fitzgibbon, QP, Hartmann, K  and Semmens, JM 2016, Assessing the impact of marine seismic surveys on southeast australian scallop and lobster fisheries, final report to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, project 2012/008. FRDC: Canberra

Archived reports

Click the links below to view reports from other years for this fish.