Tiger Prawns Penaeus esculentus, P. semisulcatus

Justin Roacha, Mervi Kangasb and Michelle Winningc


Brown Tiger Prawn (P. esculentus)
Grooved Tiger Prawn (P. semisulcatus)

Table 1: Stock status determinations for Brown Tiger Prawn

Jurisdiction

Commonwealth

New South
Wales

Queensland

Western Australia

Stock

NPF

NPF

TSPF

New South Wales
(EGF, EPTF, OTF)

ECOTFd

SBPMF

EGPMF

OPMF

Stock status

Brown
Tiger Prawn

Grooved
Tiger Prawn

Brown
Tiger Prawn

 

Brown and Grooved Tiger Prawns

Brown
Tiger Prawn

Brown
Tiger Prawn

Brown
Tiger Prawn

Sustainable

Sustainable

Sustainable

Undefined

Sustainable

Sustainable

Sustainable

Sustainable

Indicators

Estimate
of spawner stock size, effort

Estimate
of spawner stock size, effort

Estimate of biomass, catch,
effort

na

Biomass, catch, effort

Survey estimates of spawning stock

Survey estimates of spawning stock

Catch

ECOTF = East Coast Otter Trawl Fishery (Queensland); EGF = Estuary General Fishery (New South Wales); EGPMF = Exmouth Gulf Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia); EPTF = Estuary Prawn Trawl Fishery (New South Wales); na = not available; NPF = Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth); OPMF = Onslow Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia); OTF = Ocean Trawl Fishery (New South Wales); SBPMF = Shark Bay Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia); TSPF = Torres Strait Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth) ​


Stock Structure

Since biological stock structure for these species is uncertain, stock status classifications are undertaken at the management unit level for fisheries in the Commonwealth, Queensland and Western Australia, and the jurisdiction level for New South Wales. The standard name 'Tiger Prawn' refers to the species Penaeus esculentus, P. semisulcatus and Marsupenaeus japonicus. Only P. esculentus (Brown Tiger Prawn) and P. semisulcatus (Grooved Tiger Prawn) are considered in this chapter because M. japonicus is not caught commercially in Australian waters.


Stock Status

Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth) Brown Tiger Prawn management unit

Brown and Grooved Tiger Prawn stocks are assessed as part of the annual integrated bioeconomic model undertaken for the Northern Prawn Fishery (NPF)1. The base-case estimate of spawner stock size for Brown Tiger Prawn at the end of 2010 was 165 per cent (range 109–165 per cent) of the spawner stock size at maximum sustainable yield (SMSY)1. On this basis, the management unit is not considered to be recruitment overfished.

In 2010, effort (1175 boat days) was below the level that would achieve MSY (EMSY; 4723 boat days)1. This level of effort is unlikely to cause the management unit to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, Brown Tiger Prawn in the Northern Prawn Fishery management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.


Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth) Grooved Tiger Prawn management unit

The base-case estimate of spawner stock size for Grooved Tiger Prawn at the end of 2010 was 142 per cent of SMSY  (range 130–143 per cent)1. On this basis, the management unit is not considered to be recruitment overfished.

In 2011, effort (3928 boat days) was below the estimate of EMSY  (12 063 boat days)1. This level of effort is unlikely to cause the management unit to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, Grooved Tiger Prawn in the Northern Prawn Fishery management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.


Torres Strait  Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth) Brown Tiger Prawn management unit

The most recent assessment uses two separate modelling approaches, producing two separate estimates of MSY and EMSY2. Commercial catch of this stock has been below the mean estimates of MSY (606 tonnes [t] and 676 t) for the past five seasons (2006–10), and effort has been below the estimates of EMSY (8245 and 9197 fishing nights) for the past seven seasons (2004–10)3. This level of catch and effort is unlikely to cause the management unit to become recruitment overfished.

Some components of the assessment were updated in 20074; this indicated that biomass in 2006 was 60–80 per cent of the unfished (1980) level. This was considerably higher than biomass that supports MSY (BMSY), estimated to be around 28–38 per cent of the unfished level2,4. As a result of the 2006 biomass estimate and low levels of catch and effort since that estimate, the management unit is not considered to be recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, Brown Tiger Prawn in the Torres Strait Prawn Fishery management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.


New South Wales

Uncertainty exists around the stock structure. Tiger Prawns caught in New South Wales are at the edge of their geographic range, and catches are very low5. Hence, no stock assessment has been completed. Insufficient information is available to confidently classify the status of this stock; as a result, the management unit is classified as an undefined stock.


East Coast Otter Trawl Fishery (Queensland) Brown and Grooved Tiger Prawn management unit

Brown and Grooved Tiger Prawns are recorded as 'Tiger Prawns' by Queensland commercial fishers. The most recent assessment of Tiger Prawn fishing effort (2004) estimated the EMSY at 19 618 fishing days. From 2001 to 2007, effort for Tiger Prawns decreased by 75 per cent and, since 2007, effort has been below EMSY6. This level of fishing effort is unlikely to cause the management unit to become recruitment overfished.

The most recent assessment estimated that the biomass in 2003 was 137 per cent of the unfished (1988) level7. In addition, the recent East Coast Otter Trawl Fishery ecological risk assessment found that there is a low risk of Brown Tiger Prawns being overfished at 2010 effort levels6. The management unit is not considered to be recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, Tiger Prawns in the East Coast Otter Trawl Fishery management unit are classified as a sustainable stock.


Shark Bay Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia) Brown Tiger Prawn management unit

Standardised catch per unit effort data are used as an indicator of abundance, and can be used to monitor changes in stock levels from year to year. The average commercial catch and catch rate are compared with a 10-year (1989–98) reference point8.

This Brown Tiger Prawn management unit is also assessed each year using fishery-independent recruitment and spawning stock surveys. These methods are the primary means for assessing stock status. Recruitment surveys provide an index of annual recruitment and are also the basis of an annual Brown Tiger Prawn catch prediction.

A spawning stock–recruitment relationship exists for Brown Tiger Prawns9–11, and the maintenance of adequate spawning stock (using a threshold catch rate) is the key management objective. Brown Tiger Prawns are managed to reference levels (catch rates) and accompanying decision rules.

A mandatory closure of the Brown Tiger Prawn spawning area is enforced, either to a catch rate threshold or on a set date (around June–July), whichever is sooner, to protect the spawning stock. The fishery operates on a real-time management basis: commercial catch rates are monitored nightly to ensure that the Brown Tiger Prawn spawning areas are closed at the appropriate time. As fishing ceases in this area, fishery-independent surveys are then conducted to verify catch rates.

The 2010 spawning stock surveys showed a mean catch rate of 27.1 kg/hour in the Brown Tiger Prawn spawning area. This is within the target threshold range of 25–30 kg/hr12, indicating that the biomass of this management unit is unlikely to be recruitment overfished. With respect to fishing mortality, the assessment also set a target catch range for the 2010 season of 400–700 t. Total catch (423 t) was within the target catch range and below the average catch over the past 15 years (540 t)12. This evidence indicates that the current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the management unit to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, Brown Tiger Prawn in the Shark Bay Prawn Managed Fishery management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.

 

Exmouth Gulf Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia) Brown Tiger Prawn management unit

Stock assessments for this management unit are undertaken using similar methods to those used in the Shark Bay Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia). Three standardised Brown Tiger Prawn spawning stock surveys were carried out from August to October 2010, with an average catch rate of 36.6 kg/hour, well above the target threshold level of 25 kg/hour. This evidence indicates that the management unit is unlikely to be recruitment overfished. The projected commercial catch from fishery-independent surveys for 2010 was 270–410 t, and the long-term target catch range is 250–550 t. Total commercial catch for 2010 was 388 t, which was within both the projected and target catch range and below the average catch rate of 446 t (averaged over the previous eight years). This evidence indicates that the current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the management unit to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, Brown Tiger Prawn in the Exmouth Gulf Prawn Managed Fishery management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.


Onslow Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia) Brown Tiger Prawn management unit

Stock assessments for this management unit are undertaken using similar methods as for other Western Australian Brown Tiger Prawn stocks; however, fishery-independent surveys are not undertaken. Historical commercial catch levels from periods when recruitment is known not to have been affected by fishing effort (1989–98) have been used as the basis for calculating commercial target catch ranges (10–120 t)12. Total commercial catch for 2010 was 27 t, within the target range but below the long-term (25 years) average catch of 50 t. The current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the management unit to become recruitment overfished.

Since 2006, a maximum of three boats per year have operated in this fishery, and catch rates varied between 4 and 18 kg/hour between 2006 and 2009. In 2010, the catch rate was 17 kg/hour, which is within the range seen during these low-effort years. The management unit is not considered to be recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, Brown Tiger Prawn in the Onslow Prawn Managed Fishery management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.


Table 2: Brown and Grooved Tiger Prawn biology12–14

Longevity and maximum size

1–2 years; 5.5 cm CL

Maturity (50%)

East coast: ~6 months; 3.2–3.9 cm CL West coast: ~6 months; 2.7–3.5 cm CL Northern Australia: ~6 months; 3.2–3.9 cm CL

CL = carapace length


Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of Tiger Prawn in Australian waters, 2010
Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of Tiger Prawn in Australian waters, 2010

Main features and statistics for Tiger Prawns stocks/fisheries in Australia in 2010
  • Fishing is primarily undertaken using demersal prawn otter trawl gear.
  • Input controls are the main type of management implemented across jurisdictions. These include gear restrictions, seasonal and temporal closures, and total allowable effort limits. The Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth) is in the process of moving to output controls, in the form of total allowable catches and individual transferable quotas.
  • The numbers of vessels that recorded commercial catch of Tiger Prawns in 2010 were 240 in the East Coast Otter Trawl Fishery (Queensland), 52 in the Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth), 44 in Western Australian fisheries (18 in Shark Bay Prawn Managed Fishery, 9 in Exmouth Gulf Prawn Managed Fishery, 1 in the Onslow Prawn Managed Fishery and 16 in other fisheries) and 21 in the Torres Strait Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth). The number of vessels in New South Wales is unknown.
  • The total amount of Tiger Prawns caught commercially in Australia in 2010 was 3610 t, comprising 1273 t in the East Coast Otter Trawl Fishery (Queensland), 1149 t in the Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth), 838 t in Western Australia (423 t in the Shark Bay Prawn Managed Fishery, 388 t in the Exmouth Gulf Prawn Managed Fishery and 27 t in the Onslow Prawn Managed Fishery), 344 t in the Torres Strait Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth) and 6 t in New South Wales (NSW Department of Primary Industries, pers. comm. 2012)3,6,12. These species are not targeted by either recreational or Indigenous fishers.

Figure 2: Historical commercial catch of Tiger Prawns in Australian waters, 1989–2010 (calendar year)
Figure 2: Historical commercial catch of Tiger Prawns in Australian waters, 1989–2010 (calendar year)

Catch Explanation

The commercial catch of Australian Tiger Prawns grew rapidly throughout the 1970s and 1980s, peaking in 1995. Since then, a number of factors have contributed to the reduction in commercial catch and effort, including spatial and temporal closures, rising fuel and infrastructure costs, and declining Tiger Prawn prices. Structural adjustment in the Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth) has also contributed to declining catch. Currently, 52 vessels are active in the Northern Prawn Fishery, compared with 302 in 1977.


Effects of fishing on the marine environment
  • There is typically a high proportion of bycatch, relative to retained product, in otter trawl fisheries. Post-release survival of these species is variable15.
  • The use of turtle excluder devices and bycatch reduction devices is mandatory in all Australian tropical prawn trawl fisheries. Use of turtle excluder devices in the Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth) reduced turtle bycatch from 5700 individuals per year (before 2001) to approximately 30 per year (after 2001)16. The introduction of turtle excluder devices in the Western Australian prawn trawl fisheries in 2003 reduced turtle bycatch by at least 95 per cent17.
  • Trawling activity associated with Tiger Prawns mainly focuses on areas of soft sediment. Repeated trawling is thought to lead to depletion of sedentary species6.
  • Seagrass beds are important for the productivity of the fishery. Many of these areas are closed to trawling, either permanently or during times important to the biological cycle of prawns18.
  • The Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth) was certified as a sustainable and well-managed fishery by the Marine Stewardship Council in November 2012.

Environmental effects on Tiger Prawns
  • Biomass of prawns can be highly variable and affected by environmental factors such as water temperatures, cyclones, and broadscale oceanographic features19–20. Cyclones can have either a positive or a negative impact on prawn biomass and availability. Early-season (December– January) cyclones can increase mortality of small prawns through the scouring of nursery areas, destroying seagrass and algal habitats. Conversely, mortality can decrease when water becomes turbid, because predation decreases12.


a Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
b Department of Fisheries, Western Australia
c  Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Queensland
d  In Queensland, Grooved and Brown Tiger Prawns are not differentiated because commercial logbooks do not differentiate between them.