Pale octopus ​Octopus pallidus

Timothy Emerya, Klaas Hartmanna, Corey Greenb and Mike Steerc


Pale Octopus

Table 1: Stock status determination for Pale Octopus

Jurisdiction

Tasmania

Victoria

South Australia

Stock

Tasmania

(TOF)

Victoria

(PPBF, RLF, TF)

South Australia

(MSF, NZRLF, SZRLF)

Stock status

Negligiblea

Transitional–depleting

Undefined

Indicators

CPUE

Catch


CPUE = catch per unit effort; MSF = Marine Scalefish Fishery (South Australia); NZRLF = Northern Zone Rock Lobster Fishery (South Australia); PPBF = Port Phillip Bay Fishery (Victoria); RLF = Rock Lobster Fishery (Victoria); SZRLF = Southern Zone Rock Lobster Fishery (South Australia); TF = Trawl Fishery (Victoria); TOF = Tasmanian Octopus Fishery

a 'Negligible' means historically low catch; no stock status. Octopus spp. catch from the MSF in 2013 was 7.6 tonnes; average catch in the past 10 years was 14.3 tonnes.


Stock Structure

Pale Octopus is distributed from the Great Australian Bight around Tasmania to southern New South Wales. There is evidence suggesting that Pale Octopus is a highly structured biological stock with discrete subpopulations in Bass Strait (less than 100 km apart) because of limited dispersal and isolation by distance, but further information is required to confirm the overall population structure across southern Australia1,2. For the purposes of this assessment, the stock status is assessed at a jurisdictional level.


Stock Status

Tasmania

In Tasmania, where most of the total commercial catch is taken, stock status is based on consideration of commercial catch-and-effort data, which are assessed by determining fishery performance indicators and comparing them with reference points. Commercial catch and catch per unit effort (CPUE) are used as proxies, as there are insufficient data to calculate fishing mortality or biomass. These are compared with the reference periods 2000–01 to 2009–10 for catch, and 2004–05 to 2009–10 for CPUE. Since November 2004, a 50‑pot sampling program has been conducted in the fishery. Under this program, fishers are required to collect all octopuses caught in 50 randomly selected pots from a single line, representing 10 per cent of a standard commercial line.

In the Tasmanian Octopus Fishery, catches have fluctuated around 85 (±7) tonnes (t) since 2005–06 but reached a historical high of 117 t in 2012–13. Effort also fluctuated around 299 900 (±14 250) pot-lifts between 2005–06 and 2011–12, but over the last two fishing seasons has increased to an average of 425 800 pot-lifts. The standardised CPUE, calculated from the 50‑pot random sampling program, suggests a decline in catch rate, particularly over the past three fishing seasons (2011–12 to 2013–14), to around 60 per cent of the 2004–05 reference year. This was after CPUE fluctuated at around 88 per cent over the previous five fishing seasons. The unstandardised CPUE from the 50-pot random sampling program (0.32 octopuses per pot-lift) has been less than the lowest number of octopuses per pot-lift from the historical reference period (0.39 octopuses per potlift between 2004–05 and 2009–10), therefore exceeding the trigger reference point.

Although semelparous species such as Pale Octopus have high interannual variability in catch due to seasonality, and variations in recruitment, food availability, behaviour and individual migration3, the recent decline in CPUE, coupled with an increase in fishing effort, suggests that fishing mortality could be reducing the spawning biomass and affecting recruitment. Brooding female octopuses are the most vulnerable to fishing pressure, as they use pots as shelters to deposit their eggs4,5. Consequently, the removal of brooding females may adversely affect egg production. Scientific studies have previously found evidence of size-selective fishing in Tasmania, with female weight-at-age decreasing and growth increasing across sampling seasons, potentially impacting egg production and future recruitment to the fishery5. The above evidence indicates that the stock is not yet considered to be in a recruitment overfished state, but the current level of fishing pressure is likely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, Pale Octopus in Tasmania is classified as a transitionaldepleting stock.

Victoria

In Victoria, octopus is a byproduct species caught across various fisheries, primarily in the Rock Lobster Fishery. During the past decade, up to 90 fishers have reported landing octopus species, but catches have remained low, averaging 27.4 t over this period. Catch in 2013 was 24.9 t. Pale Octopus is undifferentiated from other octopus species in Victoria, and therefore stock assessment methods cannot be formally employed. Insufficient information is available to confidently classify the status of this stock.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, Pale Octopus in Victoria is classified as an undefined stock.


Table 2: Pale Octopus biology4,6,7

Longevity and maximum size

1.5 years; 1200 g

Maturity (50%)

Females 473 g, males <250 g


Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of Pale Octopus in Australian waters, 2013 (calendar year)
Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of Pale Octopus in Australian waters, 2013 (calendar year)



Table 3: Main features and statistics for Pale Octopus fisheries in Australia, 2013 (calendar year)

Jurisdiction

Tasmania

Victoria

Fishing methods

Commercial

Trap/pot

Fish/prawn trawl

Net/seine

Recreational

Hand collection/hook/net/spear

Indigenousa

Hand collection/hook/net/spear

Management methods

Commercial

Limited entry

Gear restrictions

Recreational

Bag limits

Indigenousa

Bag limits

Active commercial vessels

2 in TOF

6 in PPBF

66 in RLF

8 in TF

Catch

Commercial

70.6 t in TOF

0.9 t in PPBFb

16.2 t in RLFb

7.8 t in TFb

Recreational

1149 octopus landed (2007–08)

Unknown

Indigenousa

Unknown

None

Markets

Domestic

Export


PPBF = Port Phillip Bay Fishery (Victoria); RLF = Rock Lobster Fishery (Victoria); TF = Trawl Fishery (Victoria); TOF = Tasmanian Octopus Fishery

a In Victoria, regulations for managing recreational fishing are also applied to fishing activities by Indigenous people. Recognised Traditional Owners (groups that hold native title or have agreements under the Victorian Traditional Owner Settlement Act 2010) are exempt (subject to conditions) from the requirement to hold a recreational fishing licence, and can apply for permits under the Fisheries Act 1995 that authorise customary fishing (e.g. different catch and size limits, or equipment). The Indigenous category in Table 3 refers to customary fishing undertaken by recognised Traditional Owners. In 2012–13, there were no applications for customary fishing permits to access Pale Octopus.

b In Victoria, Pale Octopus catch is undifferentiated from other octopus species.


Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of Pale Octopus in Australian waters, 2013 (calendar year)
Figure 2: Commercial catch of Pale Octopus in Australian waters, 2000 to 2013 (calendar years)



Effects of fishing on the marine environment
  • In Tasmania, fishing vessels for Pale Octopus do not operate at night, and no bait is used in the pots, so they do not attract seabirds8 . Surface gear is minimal, encompassing two buoys and ropes for each surface line; this means that the likelihood of entanglement of marine mammals is lower than for rock lobster fisheries, which set more buoys and ropes8. The pots are lightweight and set on sandy bottom, and have been found to have little impact on benthic assemblages9.

  • Bycatch in the octopus fishery in Tasmania is low, and protected species interactions have been minimal, with seals the only species reported. Seal interactions are relatively rare (28 interaction records since 2000–01), and result in lost catch and gear damage8. Entanglement of migrating whales in pot fisheries has been reported in Western Australia. No interactions with whales have been reported in Tasmania, despite Bass Strait covering part of the migratory route of Southern Right Whales8.


Environmental effects on Pale octopus
  • Octopus species are known for having high individual growth plasticity10, short life spans (less than 2 years)11 and biological processes (including growth and egg production) that are strongly influenced by environmental factors such as seasonal temperature 3,4. If environmental conditions are unfavourable during the optimal spawning period (late summer to early autumn), significant declines in recruitment can occur as a result of suboptimal growth, and reduced egg production and fecundity4,6. Additionally, Pale Octopus hatched during summer and autumn may grow faster and mature earlier, with potentially higher fecundity due to warmer temperatures, than those hatched during winter and spring4,6.



a Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania
b Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Victoria
c South Australian Research and Development Institute