Table 1: Stock status determination for Southern Bluefin Tuna
Jurisdiction |
Commonwealth |
Stock |
Global (CCSBT, SBTF) |
Stock status |
|
Overfished |
Indicators |
Spawning stock biomass, projections of rebuilding |
CCSBT = Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna; SBTF = Australian Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery (Commonwealth)
Southern Bluefin Tuna constitutes a single, highly migratory biological stock that spawns in the north-east Indian Ocean and migrates throughout the temperate southern oceans, supporting a number of international fisheries1.
Global biological stock
The biological stock of Southern Bluefin Tuna is fished by Australian fishers endorsed to fish in the Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery (Commonwealth), and numerous other international jurisdictions. As well, the species is caught by recreational fishers in the waters off southern Australia, and there are other sources of unaccounted mortalities, including catches by fleets that are not members of the Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBTb)2,3. The reported global catch peaked in the late 1950s before declining substantially; it has been relatively stable since the mid-2000s.
In 2011, the CCSBT adopted a management procedure (analogous to a harvest strategy) to guide the recovery of the biological stock to 20 per cent of unfished biomass by 2035 with 70 per cent probability. Performance of the management procedure is measured using the biomass of fish that are 10 years and older. Since 2012, the agreed management procedure has been used to set the global total allowable catch, which was set at 10 949 tonnes (t) in 2013. In line with this, Australia’s total allowable catch for the 2012-13 fishing season was 4 663 t, of which 4 529 t was landed. The current level of fishing mortality from all sources is uncertain, but there are indications that it may be substantial3. The most recent assessment (2014) undertaken by the CCSBT takes into account reported catch from all international jurisdictions3. It also examines the sensitivity of the results to unaccounted mortalities, based on scenarios given the uncertainty.
The most recent assessment estimated that the biomass of fish 10 years and older in the Southern Bluefin Tuna biological stock is at 6–9 per cent of unfished levels3. The most recent estimate of spawning stock biomass is 8–12 per cent of unfished levels3. Projections of the performance of the management procedure under scenarios of different levels of unaccounted mortalities showed that these mortalities reduce the probability of rebuilding to below 70 per cent, the specified interim management target3. Although there has been a slight improvement in the estimated biomass of fish 10 years and older since the last assessment in 20114, the biological stock is recruitment overfished at a global scale, and well below the interim target level agreed by the CCSBT2,3. The level of fishing pressure may prevent the stock from recovering from its recruitment overfished state in line with the management procedure, and a significant trend of improvements in biomass is yet to be detected.
On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as an overfished stock.
Table 2: Southern Bluefin Tuna biology3
Longevity and maximum size |
40+ years; ~1900 mm FL |
Maturity (50%) |
~11–12 years; 1580–1630 mm FL |
FL = fork length
Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of Southern Bluefin Tuna in Australian Fisheries, 2013 (calendar year)
Table 3: Main features and statistics for Southern Bluefin Tuna fisheries in Australia, 2012–13 (fishing season: 1 December – 30 November)
Jurisdiction |
Commonwealth |
Fishing methods |
Commercial |
Purse seine |
✓ |
Pelagic longline |
✓ |
Minor line (troll and poling) |
✓ |
Recreationala,b |
Rod and line |
✓ |
Spearfishing |
✓ |
Indigenousc |
|
Unknown |
Management methods |
Commercial |
Catch limits |
✓ |
Individual transferable quotas |
✓ |
Area restrictions |
✓ |
Recreationala,b |
Bag limits |
✓ |
Boat limits |
✓ |
Indigenousc |
|
None |
Active vessels |
|
25 in SBTF (5 purse seine; 20 longline)
391 in CCSBT |
Catch |
Commercial |
4539 t in SBTF (4198 t in purse seine; 341 t in longline)
11 726 t in CCSBT (2013 calendar year) |
Recreationala,b |
Unknown |
Indigenousc |
Unknown |
Markets |
Domestic |
|
Export |
✓ |
CCSBT = Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna; SBTF = Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery (Commonwealth)
a The Australian Government does not manage recreational fishing in Commonwealth waters. Recreational fishing in Commonwealth waters is managed by the state or territory immediately adjacent to those waters, under its management regulations.
b Recreational and Indigenous fishing sectors reported here are New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria and Western Australia. A tick indicates that a measure exists in at least one of these jurisdictions.
c The Australian Government does not manage noncommercial Indigenous fishing in Commonwealth waters, with the exception of the Torres Strait. In general, noncommercial Indigenous fishing in Commonwealth waters is managed by the state or territory immediately adjacent to those waters.

Figure 2: Global commercial catch of Southern Bluefin Tuna, 1952 to 2013 (calendar years)
Southern Bluefin Tuna was listed as conservation dependent under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 in 2010.
An ecological risk sssessment on nontarget species in the purse-seine fishery, which caught approximately 93 per cent of the Southern Bluefin Tuna in the 2012–13 fishing season, found that the risk to the sustainability of nontarget species was low8.
Australia implements regulations to minimise the environmental impact of fisheries for tuna and tuna-like species on pelagic ecosystems, specifically on seabirds, sea turtles and sharks.
Australia has prohibited the practice of shark finning and the use of wire leaders in longline fisheries managed by the Commonwealth, to reduce fishery impacts on sharks.
- Interannual variation in abundance of Southern Bluefin Tuna in the Great Australian Bight is well documented. This variation has not been directly linked to environmental variables9, although it is possible that environmental factors play a role.
a Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
b www.ccsbt.org