Red Emperor Lutjanus sebae​

Stephen Newmana, Julie Martinb, Malcolm Keagc and Corey Wakefielda


Red Emperor

Table 1: Stock status determination for Red Emperor

Jurisdiction

Western Australia

Northern Territory

Queensland

Stock

Gascoyne
(GDSMF)

Pilbara
(PFTIMF, PTMF)

Kimberley
(NDSMF)

Northern Territory
(DF, TRF)

Gulf of Carpentaria
(GOCDFFTF, GOCLF)

East coast Queensland
(CRFFF)

Stock status

         

Sustainable

Sustainable

Sustainable

Undefined

Undefined

Undefined

Indicators

Age structure, fishing mortality rates of indicator species

Spawning stock level, age structure, catch, CPUE

Spawning stock level, age structure, catch, CPUE

Catch, trigger reference points

Catch, standardised CPUE, observer surveys

Catch, performance indicators

CPUE = catch per unit effort; CRFFF = Coral Reef Fin Fish Fishery (Queensland); DF = Demersal Fishery (Northern Territory); GDSMF = Gascoyne Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery (Western Australia); GOCDFFTF = Gulf of Carpentaria Developmental Fin Fish Trawl Fishery (Queensland); GOCLF = Gulf of Carpentaria Line Fishery (Queensland); NDSMF = Northern Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery (Western Australia); PFTIMF = Pilbara Fish Trawl Interim Managed Fishery (Western Australia); PTMF = Pilbara Trap Managed Fishery (Western Australia); TRF = Timor Reef Fishery (Northern Territory)


Stock Structure

Red Emperor is exploited primarily in the North Coast Bioregion of Western Australia1. Smaller catches are taken in the Northern Territory and Queensland. Red Emperor is one of the indicator species used to assess the status of the demersal resources in the North Coast Bioregion. In Western Australia, analysis of otolith stable isotopes indicates that Red Emperor comprises a number of separate biological stocks, one in each of the main management regions: the Kimberley, the Pilbara and the Gascoyne2,3. Reporting of status is undertaken at the level of these individual biological stocks in Western Australia. Because multiple biological stocks are present within Western Australia, there is also a high likelihood of multiple biological stocks across the Northern Territory and Queensland. However, stock delineation is not currently known in these jurisdictions. In the Northern Territory, status is reported at the jurisdictional level; in Queensland, status is reported at the management unit level.


Stock Status

Gascoyne biological stock

The Gascoyne biological stock is exploited as a component of the Gascoyne Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery (Western Australia)1. The catch of Red Emperor in the Gascoyne Bioregion is very low (Table 3). In the Gascoyne Bioregion Red Emperor is assessed on the basis of the status of several indicator species (Snapper—Chrysophrys auratus, Goldband Snapper—Pristipomoides multidens, and Spangled Emperor— Lethrinus nebulosus) that represent the entire inshore demersal suite of species occurring at depths of 30–250 m. These species were selected using a risk-based approach, based on the relative vulnerability of the species to exploitation.

The major performance measures for these indicator species are either estimates of current spawning stock levels or fishing mortality–based assessments. The target level of spawning biomass is 40 per cent of the unfished level, and the limit level is 30 per cent of the unfished level. Data analysis using an integrated age-structured model estimated that the spawning biomass levels of Snapper were close to 40 per cent of the unfished level in the Gascoyne Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery (Western Australia) in 20111. The Gascoyne biological stock is not considered to be recruitment overfished.

The indicator species Goldband Snapper and Spangled Emperor in the Gascoyne Bioregion were assessed using fishing mortality (F)–based assessments 1 (derived from catch-curve analysis of representative samples of the age structure). These assessments use reference levels that are based on ratios of natural mortality (M) for each species, such that Ftarget = 2/3M, Fthreshold = M and Flimit = 3/2 M. These assessments indicated that the fishing levels of Goldband Snapper were at or below the target level. Whereas, Spangled Emperor were below the target level in one area, and above the limit level in another area, suggesting spatial confinement of growth overfishing. On balance, the assessments indicate that indicator species are not recruitment overfished. Therefore, given catches of Red Emperor are low, the current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the biological stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a sustainable stock.  

Pilbara biological stock

The major performance measures for the Pilbara biological stock, for Red Emperor landed in the Pilbara Trap Managed Fishery and the Pilbara Fish Trawl Interim Managed Fishery, are based on estimates of current spawning stock levels of Red Emperor. The target level of spawning biomass is 40 per cent of the unfished (1972) biomass. The limit level is 30 per cent of the unfished spawning biomass. The spawning biomass level of Red Emperor overall (across all management areas of the Pilbara biological stock) was greater than 40 per cent in the Pilbara Demersal Scalefish Fisheries in 2007 (the year the last integrated assessment was undertaken), using an integrated age-structured model4. The stock is therefore not considered to be recruitment overfished.

An assessment of fishing mortality derived from representative samples of the age structure of Red Emperor was also undertaken for separate management areas in the Pilbara biological stock in 2007. These fishing mortality (F)–based assessments use the reference levels defined above for the Gascoyne biological stock. The assessments indicated that the fishing level on Red Emperor in 2007 was between the target and threshold levels, but above the limit level in some areas4. This indicates that fishing was having an impact on the age structure of the population in some management areas. Effort reductions since 2008 have resulted in decreasing catch levels. In 2007, the Red Emperor catch from the Pilbara biological stock was 187 tonnes (t). The catch decreased to 154 t in 2008, and remained at a similar level in 2009 (159 t) and 2010 (167 t). From 2008 to 2010, the catch-rate trends for Red Emperor in all trawl managed areas increased each year. This was considered to be a response to the effort reductions imposed on the trawl fishery since 2008. From 2010 to 2013, the catch-rate trends of Red Emperor have been stable in all trawl managed areas, except Area 2, where there has been a slight decline. The above evidence indicates that the current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a sustainable stock.  

Kimberley biological stock

The major performance measures for the Kimberley biological stock of Red Emperor relate to spawning stock levels. The target level of spawning biomass is 40 per cent of the unfished (1980) level. The limit level is 30 per cent of the unfished level. The spawning biomass level of Red Emperor was greater than 40 per cent in the Northern Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery in 2007 (the year the last integrated assessment was undertaken), as derived by synthesising the available data in an integrated age-structured model4. Catch levels of Red Emperor in the Northern Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery over the past 5 years (2009 to 2013) have been stable, ranging between 128 and 156 t, and are below the catch levels for the preceding 5‑year period (2004 to 2008) of sustainable fishing, when catches ranged between 164 and 192 t4. The stock is not considered to be recruitment overfished.

An assessment of fishing mortality derived from representative samples of the age structure of Red Emperor was also undertaken for the Northern Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery in 2006 and 2008. These fishing mortality (F)–based assessments use the reference levels defined above for the Gascoyne biological stock. The assessments indicated that the fishing level on Red Emperor was lower than the target level in 2006 and 20084. This indicates that fishing is not having an unacceptable impact on the age structure of the population. The above evidence indicates that the current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a sustainable stock.  

Northern Territory

Red Emperor comprises around 2 per cent of the total catch in the Northern Territory offshore snapper fisheries. It is managed as part of the ‘group species’ quota category (species other than Goldband Snapper, Saddletail Snapper and Crimson Snapper) in the Timor Reef Fishery and the Demersal Fishery. The performance indicators and trigger points are based on significant changes in species composition of the catch, which are used to indicate whether significant catch increases warrant further management efforts. Since 1995, catches of Red Emperor have varied between 1.5 and 4.5 per cent of the total annual catch, and increased from 20 t in 1995 to 55 t in 2013. The trigger point of an increase of more than 15 per cent of the species’ previous year’s catch weight, or of a species becoming dominant relative to other species in the group, was not reached in 2013.

This evidence suggests that the current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause Red Emperor in the Northern Territory to become recruitment overfished. However, at present, insufficient information is available to determine the biomass of the species in the Northern Territory.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, Red Emperor in the Northern Territory is classified as an undefined stock.  

Gulf of Carpentaria management unit

Red Emperor has historically been taken by demersal fish trawl (Gulf of Carpentaria Developmental Fin Fish Trawl Fishery [Queensland]) and by line (Gulf of Carpentaria Line Fishery [Queensland]). Participants in the Gulf of Carpentaria Line Fishery primarily target Spanish Mackerel ( Scomberomorus commerson) by trolling. Since 2010, catch of Red Emperor in this fishery has fallen to very low levels, primarily as a result of decline in fishing effort in the area. Harvest from the adjacent Northern Territory component of the stock has been low in recent years.

Commercial catches in the Gulf of Carpentaria Developmental Fin Fish Trawl Fishery have been historically variable. Fish trawl effort in the Gulf of Carpentaria declined markedly in 2012 and further in 2013, as a result of transfer of effort to Northern Territory regions outside the Gulf. There are limited data on the distribution and abundance of Red Emperor in the Gulf of Carpentaria5,6. Nominal commercial catch rates have been historically variable, although long-term standardised catch rates to 2009 showed significant declines7. Observer surveys from 2004 to 2006 showed that most Red Emperor caught in the Gulf of Carpentaria Developmental Fin Fish Trawl Fishery was discarded, the majority of which were immature (unpublished data).

Insufficient information is available to confidently classify the status of this stock.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the management unit is classified as an undefined stock.  

East coast Queensland management unit

There has been no stock assessment to determine biomass in the east coast Queensland management unit.

Red Emperor is mainly harvested by the recreational sector. Recreational catch estimates have fallen from approximately 200 t in 2000 to 150 t in 2010, despite the latest survey showing that recreational anglers are targeting Red Emperor more often. A harvest reduction of this magnitude was also reflected in charter catch over the same period (charter fishing is a subset of recreational fishing), mainly over the past 5 years.

Annual commercial catches have been 25–60 t since 2004–05, following several years of much higher catches (100–200 t per year) from 1997–98 to 2004–05. This decrease coincided with expansion of no-take marine reserves within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and the introduction of a quota management system for coral reef finfish species. Both factors are likely to have influenced commercial catch.

Commercial harvest is not effectively constrained by this species being part of the ‘other species’ quota category, which comprises many other coral reef finfish species, with no individual cap on any one species in this category.

Insufficient information is available to confidently classify the status of the stock.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the management unit is classified as an undefined stock.


Table 2: Red Emperor biology7–10

Longevity and maximum size

40 years; 800 mm FL, 860 mm TL

Maturity (50%)

Females: 8–10 years; 430 mm FL, 460 mm TL
Males: 8 years; 460 mm FL, 490 mm TL

FL = fork length; TL = total length


Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of Red Emperor in Australian waters, 2013 (calendar year)
Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of Red Emperor in Australian waters, 2013 (calendar year)
Note: In Queensland, data for the Coral Reef Fin Fish Fishery relate to the 2012–13 financial year. Data for the Gulf of Carpentaria Developmental Fin Fish Trawl Fishery and Gulf of Carpentaria Line Fishery are for the 2013 calendar year.



Table 3: Main features and statistics for Red Emperor fisheries in Australia, 2013 (calendar year)a

Jurisdiction

Western Australia

Northern Territory

Queensland

Fishing methods

Commercial

Fish trawl

Fish trap

Hand line

Rod and line

Longline

Recreational

Hand line

Rod and line

Spearfishing

Indigenousa

Hand line

Rod and line

Management methods

Commercial

Limited entry

Spatial zoning

Size limits

✓ (not in GOCDFFTF)

Vessel restrictions

Gear restrictions

Total allowable catch

Total allowable effort

Effort limits

Spatial closures

Recreational

Licensing

Possession limits

Bag limits

Size limits

Spatial closures

Charter

Limited entry

Spatial zoning

Passenger restrictions

Bag limits

Size limits

Spatial closures

Indigenousa,b

Laws of general application

Active vessels

14 in GDSMF

8 in NDSMF

3 in PFTIMF

2 in PTMF

6 in DF

9 in TRF

179 in CRFFF

1 in GOCDFFTF

0 in GOCLF

Catch

Commercial

7 t in GDSMF

131 t in NDSMF

53 t in PFTIMF

49 t in PTMF

27 t in DF

28 t in TRF

44 t in CRFFF

1 t in GOCDFFTF

0 t in GOCLF

Recreational

7350 fish (2011–12); ~25 t11

Unknown

150 t (2010)

Charter

2200 fish; ~8 t

Unknown

13 t

Indigenous

Unknown

Unknown

Included in recreational estimate

Markets

Domestic

Export

CRFFF = Coral Reef Fin Fish Fishery (Queensland); DF = Demersal Fishery (Northern Territory); GDSMF = Gascoyne Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery (Western Australia); GOCDFFTF = Gulf of Carpentaria Developmental Fin Fish Trawl Fishery (Queensland); GOCLF = Gulf of Carpentaria Line Fishery (Queensland); NDSMF = Northern Demersal Scalefish Managed Fishery (Western Australia); PFTIMF = Pilbara Fish Trawl Interim Managed Fishery (Western Australia); PTMF = Pilbara Trap Managed Fishery (Western Australia); TRF = Timor Reef Fishery (Northern Territory)

a In Queensland, under the Fisheries Act 1994 (Qld), Indigenous fishers in Queensland are able to use prescribed traditional and noncommercial fishing apparatus in waters open to fishing. Size and possession limits, and seasonal closures do not apply to Indigenous fishers. Further exemptions to fishery regulations may be applied for through permits.

b Subject to the defence that applies under section 211 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), and the exemption from a requirement to hold a recreational fishing licence, the non-commercial take by indigenous fishers is covered by the same arrangements as that for recreational fishing.


Figure 2: Commercial catch of Red Emperor in Australian waters, 1999 to 2013 (calendar years)
Figure 2: Commercial catch of Red Emperor in Australian waters, 1999 to 2013 (calendar years)

Note: Western Australian data are combined because of confidentiality issues for one or more stocks in one or more years.




Effects of fishing on the marine environment
  • The maintenance of high levels of biomass of Red Emperor in each of the fisheries in Western Australia results in a negligible ecotrophic risk from these fisheries. Furthermore, there has been no reduction in either mean trophic level or mean maximum length in the finfish catches recorded within the Pilbara or Kimberley in Western Australia (that is, no indication of fishing-down of the food web)12.

  • Available information indicates that there are minimal impacts on habitat from trap- or line-based fishing methods for Red Emperor4.

  • Impacts to the habitat from trawling are expected to be minimal because trawling is restricted to 7 per cent of the North West Shelf and parts of the Northern Territory. Trawling does not occur in the Kimberley region1,4,8. Trawl nets in the Northern Territory have been designed to fish off the seabed, reducing interaction with benthic habitats13.

  • The bycatch of dolphins and turtles has been reduced significantly since the introduction of turtle excluder devices in Pilbara fish trawl nets in 2005. Given the area of distribution and expected population size of these protected species, the impact of the fish trawl fishery on their stocks is likely to be minimal. Gear and fishing modification continue to reduce this level of interaction1,4.

  • The main Western Australian fisheries that target Red Emperor have received either full Export Exemption or Approved Wildlife Trade Operation Exemption accreditation under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. The Northern Territory fisheries that target Red Emperor have received full Export Exemption accreditation, and the Queensland fisheries that target Red Emperor have received an Approved Wildlife Trade Operation Exemption accreditation under the Act. These assessments, subject to adherence to accompanying conditions and recommendations, demonstrate that these fisheries are managed in a manner that does not lead to overfishing, and that fishing operations have a minimal impact on the structure, productivity, function and biological diversity of the ecosystem.


Environmental effects on Red Emperor
  • Climate change and climate variability have the potential to impact fish stocks in a range of ways, including influencing their geographic distribution (for example, latitudinal shifts in distribution). However, it is unclear how climate change may affect risks to the sustainability of this species.

  • Changes in oceanographic conditions have the potential to affect the replenishment rates of fish populations, as well as individual growth rates and spawning output14.



a Department of Fisheries, Western Australia
b Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, Northern Territory
c Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Queensland