Golden Snapper (2023)
Lutjanus johnii
Date Published: June 2023
You are currently viewing a report filtered by jurisdiction. View the full report.
Summary
There are five assessment units of Golden Snapper across Australia’s north. The WA, Regional NT, Gulf of Carpentaria and Eastern Australia assessment units are sustainable, whereas the Darwin Region management unit of the NT is classified as depleted.
Stock Status Overview
Jurisdiction | Stock | Stock status | Indicators |
---|---|---|---|
Queensland | Eastern Australia | Sustainable | Catch, biomass, fishing mortality, biology, catch-MSY modelling |
Queensland | Gulf of Carpentaria | Sustainable | Catch, biomass, fishing mortality, biology, catch-MSY modelling, fishery independent survey |
Stock Structure
Golden Snapper is a moderately long-lived (i.e. 30 years), late-maturing species that can reach a length of one metre [Cappo et al. 2013]. They are broadly distributed throughout the tropical and sub-tropical Indo-West Pacific with juveniles spending several years in estuarine and inshore reef habitats before migrating to nearshore reef environments (to a depth of at least 80 m) as they near sexual maturity [Allen 1985; Kiso and Mahyam, 2003; Tanaka et al. 2011].
The distribution of this species within Australian waters extends from the Kimberley region in Western Australia, around the north of the continent to the southern Great Barrier Reef (around Rockhampton) [Travers et al. 2009]. A study of the stock structure of Golden Snapper across this range suggests that many functionally separate adult populations are present at a scale of tens of kilometres, although boundaries are unknown [Taillebois et al. 2021].
Golden Snapper experience moderate to high harvest rates in some Australian fisheries (particularly those targeting adults of this late-maturing species), which can cause localised depletion. However, it is extremely difficult to collect relevant biological and catch-and-effort information to assess each adult population unit.
Here, assessment of stock status is presented at the jurisdictional level―Western Australia; and the management unit level―Darwin Region, and Regional Northern Territory (Northern Territory); Gulf of Carpentaria (Northern Territory and Queensland), East Coast (Queensland).
Stock Status
Eastern Australia
Golden Snapper is mainly harvested by the recreational sector on the Queensland east coast, and no stock assessment has been undertaken to estimate current biomass in relation to unfished biomass in this management unit. Estimated recreational landed catch at the whole of Queensland level increased from 25 t in 2013–14 [Webley et al. 2015] to 97 t in the most recent Recreational Fishing Survey [Teixeira et al. 2021]. Estimates are unable to be given at the stock level due to low sample size. According to this survey, close to two-thirds of recreationally caught fish were released [Teixeira et al. 2021]. However, given that this species suffers substantial post-release mortality from barotrauma [Welch et al. 2014], it is likely that total fishing mortality by this sector is higher than indicated by landed catch. The Indigenous harvest from this management unit is unknown. The species is taken as by-product in the East Coast Inshore Fishery (Queensland), predominantly by set mesh net. Annual commercial catches increased from less than 1 t per year in the early 2000s to averaging 7 t over the last decade to 2021–22.
A preliminary assessment using catch data from all commercial fisheries applied to a modified catch-MSY model (developed by Martell and Froese [2013] and modified by Haddon et al. [2018]), estimated that the 2019 biomass of Golden Snapper on the East Coast was 51% of unfished levels [Saunders and Roelofs 2020a] suggesting that the biomass of this stock is unlikely to be depleted and that recruitment is unlikely to be impaired. The model estimated the fishing mortality in 2019 was equal to the limit reference point of 0.2. Harvest in recent years has been above the estimated MSY. The current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment impaired, however, should high fishing pressure continue, there is an increased risk of overfishing occurring. Catch-MSY modelling has a higher degree of uncertainty and should not be solely relied on to make inferences about long-term biomass trends. However, Golden Snapper occupy a range of habitats, and spend their juvenile years in mangrove estuaries, this likely affords some protection from fishing pressure [Kiso and Mahyam 2003]. A weight of evidence approach suggests recruitment is unlikely to be impaired.
On the basis of the evidence provided above, the East Coast (Queensland) management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.
Gulf of Carpentaria
In the Gulf of Carpentaria management unit, Golden Snapper is mainly harvested by trawl vessels in the commercial Gulf of Carpentaria Developmental Fin Fish Trawl Fishery) (GOCDFFTF—Queensland) and Demersal Fishery (DF—Northern Territory). Golden Snapper was also fished by foreign fleets between the 1950s and 1980s [O’Neill et al. 2011], and these catches (annual peak of 60 t) were higher than contemporary levels.
In the Queensland portion of this management unit commercial catches remained stable at 20–35 t annually from 2001–2011. However, fish trawl effort from the GOCDFFTF declined markedly from 2012–2020 with catch averaging less than 1 t. In 2020 Golden Snapper were transitioned to a 61 t species-specific TACC and non-transferable ITQ. The fishery recommenced in 2020–21, seeing an increase in commercial catch to 17 t, dropping again to 7 t in 2021–22. In the Northern Territory portion of this management unit, the predominant catch has been from the recreational sector with an estimated average of 3.9 t in 2019 [West et al. 2022] which seem to be stable in comparison with estimates from 2010 [West et al. 2012]. Trawl catch of Golden Snapper in Northern Territory have been < 3.5 t between 2013 and 2022 except for 2019 when a peak landing of 19.5 t was reported.
A preliminary assessment using catch data from all commercial fisheries applied to a modified catch-MSY model (developed by Martell and Froese [2013] and modified by Haddon [2018]), estimated that the 2019 biomass of Golden Snapper was 47% of unfished levels [Saunders and Roelofs 2020b] suggesting that the biomass of this stock is unlikely to be depleted and that recruitment is unlikely to be impaired. Similarly, the fishing mortality in 2019 was 0.12 which approximated the target level and was well below the limit reference point indicating that the current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment impaired. Recent fishery independent surveys estimated biomass of Golden Snapper in 2021 was 1,000 t in the western Gulf of Carpentaria [Knuckey and Koopman 2022]. The harvest fraction in 2022 is less than 1% of the estimated biomass which indicates a relatively low fishing pressure. A similar survey in the eastern Gulf of Carpentaria also estimated biomass of Golden Snapper in 2021, however the coefficient of variation (CV) was high. The survey indicated that the harvest fraction likely represents a very small percentage of the available biomass [Knuckey et al. 2022]. Catch-MSY modelling has a higher degree of uncertainty and should not be solely relied on to make inferences about long-term biomass trends. However, Golden Snapper occupy a range of habitats, and spend their juvenile years in mangrove estuaries, this likely affords some protection from fishing pressure [Kiso and Mahyam 2003]. A weight of evidence approach suggests recruitment is unlikely to be impaired.
On the basis of the evidence provided above, the Gulf of Carpentaria management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.
Biology
Golden Snapper biology [Hay et al. 2005; Cappo et al. 2013; Welch et al. 2014]
Species | Longevity / Maximum Size | Maturity (50 per cent) |
---|---|---|
Golden Snapper | 30 years, 990 mm FL, 15 kg |
Varies by location and sex: Males 4–9 years and 400–600 mm FL, Females 6–10 years and 400–650 mm FL |
Tables
Queensland | |
---|---|
Commercial | |
Line | |
Midwater Trawl | |
Net | |
Recreational | |
Spearfishing | |
Hook and Line | |
Charter | |
Hook and Line | |
Indigenous | |
Various |
Method | Queensland |
---|---|
Charter | |
Bag/possession limits | |
Gear restrictions | |
Seasonal or spatial closures | |
Size limits | |
Commercial | |
Gear restrictions | |
Harvest Strategy | |
Individual transferable quota | |
Limited entry | |
Seasonal or spatial closures | |
Size limits | |
Total allowable catch | |
Vessel restrictions | |
Recreational | |
Bag/possession limits | |
Gear restrictions | |
Seasonal or spatial closures | |
Size limits |
Queensland | |
---|---|
Commercial | 8.31t |
Charter | ≤ 1 t, 2.4 t |
Indigenous | Unknown |
Recreational | 97 t (2019–20 survey) |
Western Australia – Active Vessels. Data are unreportable as there were fewer than three vessels operating in the PFTIMF, PTMF and WL.
Western Australia – Recreational (Management methods). A Recreational Fishing from Boat License is required for the use of a powered boat to fish or to transport catch or fishing gear to or from a land-based fishing location.
Western Australia – Recreational (Catch). Boat-based recreational catch is from 1 September 2020–31 August 2021. These data are derived from those reported in Ryan et al. 2022.
Western Australia – Indigenous (Management methods). Subject to application of Section 211 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), and the exemption from a requirement to hold a recreational fishing licence, the non-commercial take by Indigenous fishers is covered by the same arrangements as that for recreational fishing.
Northern Territory – Charter (Management methods). In the Northern Territory, charter operators are regulated through the same management methods as the recreational sector but are subject to additional limits on license and passenger numbers.
Northern Territory - Indigenous (Management methods). The Fisheries Act 1988 (NT), specifies that: “Unless expressly provided otherwise, nothing in this Act derogates or limits the right of Aboriginal people who have traditionally used the resources of an area of land or water in a traditional manner to continue to use those resources in that area in that manner.”
Queensland – Indigenous (Management methods). For more informationsee: https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/business-priorities/fisheries/traditional-fishing
Queensland – Commercial (Catch). Queensland commercial and charter data has been sourced from the commercial fisheries logbook program. Further information available through the Queensland Fisheries Summary Report https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/business-priorities/fisheries/monitoring-research/data/queensland-fisheries-summary-report
Queensland – Commercial (Management Methods). Harvest strategies are available at: https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/business-priorities/fisheries/sustainable/harvest-strategy
Queensland – Recreational Fishing (Catch). Data are based at the whole of Queensland level and derived from statewide recreational fishing surveys. Where possible, estimates have been converted to weight (tonnes) using best known conversion multipliers. Conversion factors may display regional or temporal variability. In the absence of an adequate conversion factor, data presented as number of fish.
References
- Allen, GR 1985, FAO species catalogue, volume 6, snappers of the world, FAO Fisheries Synopsis 125.
- Cappo, M, Marriott, RJ and Newman, SJ 2013, James’s rule and causes and consequences of a latitudinal cline in the demography of John’s Snapper (Lutjanus johnii) in coastal waters of Australia, Fishery Bulletin, 111(4): 309–324.
- Grubert, MA, Saunders, TM, Martin, JM, Lee, HS and Walters, CJ 2013, Stock assessments of selected Northern Territory fishes, Fishery report 110, Northern Territory Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Darwin.
- Haddon, M, Punt, A and Burch, P 2018, simpleSA: a package containing functions to facilitate relatively simple stock assessments, R package version 0.1.1.18
- Hay, T, Knuckey, I, Calogeras, C and Errity, C 2005, Population and biology of the Golden Snapper, Fishery report 21, Northern Territory Government, Darwin.
- Kiso, K and Mahyam, MI 2003, Distribution and feeding habits of juvenile and young John’s snapper Lutjanus johnii in the Matang mangrove estuary, west coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Fisheries Science, 69: 563–568.
- Knuckey, I, Koopman, M, and Hudson, R 2022, Survey of tropical snapper in Queensland Gulf of Carpentaria Developmental Fin Fish Trawl Fishery
- Knuckey, IA and Koopman, M 2022, Survey of tropical snapper in Northern Territory fisheries - 2021, Fishwell Consulting.
- Martell, S and Froese, R 2013, A simple method for estimating MSY from catch and resilience, Fish and Fisheries 14: 504–514.
- Northern Territory Government (NTG) 2017, Status of key Northern Territory Fish Stocks Report 2015, Northern Territory Government Department of Resources, fishery report 118.
- O’Neill, MF, Leigh, GM, Martin, JM, Newman, SJ, Chambers, M, Dichmont, CM and Buckworth, RC 2011, Sustaining productivity of tropical Red Snappers using new monitoring and reference points, Fisheries Research and Development Corporation project 2009/037, Queensland Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Brisbane.
- Pazhayamadom, DG 2022, Regional NT Golden Snapper Stock Status Summary – 2022, Unpublished Fishery Report.
- Ryan KL, Lai, EKM and Smallwood, CB 2022, Boat-based recreational fishing in Western Australia 2020/21, Fisheries Research Report No. 327, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia. 221pp.
- Saunders, T 2018, Stock assessment of Golden Snapper (Lutjanus johnii) in the ‘Darwin Region' of the Northern Territory, Unpublished Fishery Report.
- Saunders, T and Roelofs, A 2020a, East Coast Queensland Golden Snapper Stock Status Summary – 2020, Unpublished Fishery Report.
- Saunders, T and Roelofs, A 2020b, Gulf of Carpentaria Golden Snapper Stock Status Summary – 2020, Unpublished Fishery Report.
- Taillebois, L, Davenport, D, Barton, DP, Crook, DA, Saunders, T, Hearnden, M, Saunders, RJ, Newman, SJ, Travers, MJ, Dudgeon, CL, Maher, SL and Ovenden, JR 2021, Integrated analyses of SNP-genotype and environmental data in a continuously distributed snapper species (Lutjanus johnii, Bloch, 1792) reveals a mosaic of populations and a challenge for sustainable management, ICES Journal of Marine Science, 78(9), 3212–3229.
- Tanaka, K, Hanamura, Y, Chong, VC, Watanabe, S, Man, A, Kassim, FM, Kodama, M and Ichikawa, T 2011, Stable isotope analysis reveals ontogenetic migration and the importance of a large mangrove estuary as a feeding ground for juvenile John’s snapper Lutjanus johnii, Fisheries Science 77: 809–816.
- Teixeira, D, Janes, R and Webley, J 2021, 2019/20 Statewide Recreational Fishing Survey Key Results, Project Report. State of Queensland, Brisbane.
- Travers, MJ, Potter, IC, Clarke, KR, Newman, SJ and Hutchins, JB 2009, The inshore fish faunas over soft substrates and reefs on the tropical west coast of Australia differ and change with latitude and bioregion. Journal of Biogeography, 37: 148–169.
- Webley, J, McInnes, K, Teixeira, D, Lawson, A and Quinn, R 2015, Statewide Recreational Fishing Survey 2013-14, Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane.
- Welch, DJ, Robins, J, Saunders, T, Courtney, T, Harry, A, Lawson, E, Moore, BR, Tobin, A, Turnbull, C, Vance, D and Williams, AJ 2014, Implications of climate change impacts on fisheries resources of northern Australia, part 2: Species profiles, final report to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, project 2010/565, James Cook University, Townsville.
- West, LD, Lyle, JM, Matthews, SR, Stark, KE and Steffe, AS 2012, Survey of Recreational Fishing in the Northern Territory, 2009-10.
- West, LD, Stark, KE, Dysart, K and Lyle JM 2022, Survey of recreational fishing in the Northern Territory: 2018 to 2019.