*

Australian Blacktip Shark (2020)

Carcharhinus tilstoni

  • Michael Usher (Department of Industry, Tourism and Trade, Northern Territory Government)
  • Matias Braccini (Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia)
  • Anthony Roelofs (Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queensland)
  • Victor Peddemors (Department of Primary Industries, New South Wales)
Toggle content

Summary

Australian Blacktip Sharks are found along Australia’s northern coastline. The North Western Australia biological stock and the East Coast management unit are sustainable stocks, while the Gulf of Carpentaria management unit is undefined. Previous editions of the SAFS reports have combined Australian Blacktip Shark, Common Blacktip Shark and Spot-Tail Shark, but all three are now reported at the species level.

Photo credit: Michael Usher, Department of Primary Industry and Resources, Northern Territory.

Toggle content

Stock Status Overview

Stock status determination
Jurisdiction Stock Stock status Indicators
Northern Territory, Western Australia North Western Australia Sustainable

Biomass, fishing mortality, catch, catch rate

Northern Territory, Queensland Gulf of Carpentaria Undefined

Catch

Queensland East Coast Sustainable

Biomass, catch

Toggle content

Stock Structure

Australian Blacktip Shark (Carcharhinus tilstoni) are distributed within the waters of Northern Australia. Genetic studies have identified two biological stocks of Australian Blacktip Shark. A western stock extending from the western Northern Territory into northern Western Australia, and an eastern stock extending from the Gulf of Carpentaria to the east coast of Queensland and New South Wales [Ovenden et al. 2007]. The stock boundary between the North Western Australia and the North Eastern Australia biological stocks is uncertain.

Australian Blacktip Shark are similar in appearance to Common Blacktip Shark (C. limbatus). Previously taxonomic differentiation of these species was only possible by genetic analyses, precaudal vertebral counts or, in certain size classes, differences in size at maturity [Harry et al. 2011]. A new identification technique, utilising body measurements and pelvic fin colouration, has been developed and may assist in distinguishing between these two species [Johnson et al. 2017]. However, accurate field identification remains difficult and is not practical during fishing operations [Johnson et al. 2017]. Hybridisation between the species has also been recorded, though its implications for fisheries assessment and management remain poorly understood [Harry et al. 2012, Johnson 2017, Morgan et al. 2011]. Consequently, Australian Blacktip Shark and Common Blacktip Shark are often reported as a species complex in commercial logbooks. For the purpose of these assessments a portion of the combined blacktip shark catch for each jurisdiction has been attributed to Australian Blacktip Shark using relative abundance ratios determined from onboard observer programs and published research [Johnson 2017, Ovenden 2007].

Here, assessment of stock status for Australian Blacktip Shark is presented at the biological stock level—North Western Australia—and the management unit level—Gulf of Carpentaria (Northern Territory and Queensland) and East Coast (Queensland and New South Wales).

Toggle content

Stock Status

East Coast

The most recent stock assessment [Leigh 2015] based on data up to 2013 provided a range of annual maximum sustainable yield (MSY) estimates for Australian Blacktip Shark on the Queensland East Coast from 144 t to 670 t. The MSY range is well above the estimated total commercial catch of Australian Blacktip Shark reported from the east coast in 2018–19 (25 t) and the average ten year annual harvest (79 t). Commercial catch of Australian Blacktip Shark peaked between 2003-04 and 2007-08 (averaging 127 t per year), with the maximum catch in this period (157 t in 2003-04) being the only occasion where catches have exceeded the lower estimate of MSY since 1991-92. Harvest has declined in recent years, although this reflects poor market demand for shark products and is unlikely to be related to biomass declines. In 2009 Queensland introduced a 600 t annual total allowable commercial catch (TACC) limit (species combined), applying to all sharks and rays retained for sale on the Queensland east coast. This TACC was introduced in conjunction with an ‘S’ fishing symbol that significantly reduced the number of licences permitted to target sharks in high quantities. The catch of Australian Blacktip sharks in the Queensland Shark Control Program is negligible, averaging five individuals per year since 2001 [QFISH 2020]. Recreational harvest in Queensland is limited to one shark in possession and maximum legal size of 1.5 m total length. The 2015 stock assessment report acknowledged that there are a number of data limitations for Queensland shark fisheries, particularly with respect to the species identifications and the quantity and reliability of available catch data. Species differentiation for the Blacktip Shark complex has improved with the introduction of a new Shark and Ray logbook on 1 January 2018 that limits the ‘Blacktip Whaler’ category to C. limbatus and C. tilstoni only. While identification of Australian Blacktip Shark and Common Blacktip Shark is particularly difficult in the field, contemporary genetic data have recently been collected by a two year on-board observer program that aims to improve species composition data for sharks in Queensland fisheries. 

In New South Wales, Australian Blacktip Shark are not differentiated in commercial logbooks; however, observations on commercial fishing vessels indicate that the amount of Australian Blacktip Shark caught is likely less than 0.1% of total shark catch (Macbeth et al, 2009) and therefore represents a negligible proportion of catch for this biological stock. 

Overall the information provided by both jurisdictions indicates that the stock is not considered to be depleted and that recruitment is unlikely to be impaired. Furthermore, the level of fishing mortality is also unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment impaired.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, Australian Blacktip Shark in the East Coast management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.

Gulf of Carpentaria

The Gulf of Carpentaria biological stock straddles two jurisdictions: The Northern Territory, east of the Wessel Islands-Queensland border and Queensland, west of Torres Straight Islands to the Northern Territory border. Most Australian Blacktip Sharks in this stock are caught by Queensland Fisheries (Queensland 80 t (est.); Northern Territory 11 t). Harvest has declined in recent years, however this is due to poor market demand for shark products and is unlikely to be related to biomass declines. The most recent stock assessment for Australian Blacktip Shark in the Queensland Gulf of Carpentaria [Leigh GM 2015] based on data up to 2013 provided a range of annual maximum sustainable yield (MSY) estimates from 95 t to 513 t. Leigh [2015] also identified a number of data limitations for Queensland shark fisheries, particularly with respect to the species identifications and the quantity and reliability of available catch data. Reporting for the Blacktip Shark complex has improved in Queensland with the introduction of a new Shark and Ray logbook on 1 January 2018 that limits the ‘Blacktip Whaler’ category to C. limbatus and C. tilstoni only. Until trends in catch levels and their impact on the biological stock of Australian Blacktip Shark are better understood, there is insufficient information to confidently classify the status of this stock.  

On the basis of the evidence provided above, Australian Blacktip Shark in the Gulf of Carpentaria management unit is classified as an undefined stock.

North Western Australia

The North Western Australia biological stock straddles two jurisdictions: The Northern Territory, west of the Wessel Islands–Western Australian border; and Western Australia. Domestic catches of Australian Blacktip Shark peaked in 2012 but have subsequently declined to relatively low levels. Changing operational practices in the NT Offshore Net and Line Fishery has greatly reduced the take of Australian Blacktip Shark in the Northern Territory. There has been little to no shark-targeted fishing occurring in the Northern Territory since 2012 as a result of declining shark fin prices and increasing value of Grey Mackerel (Scomberomorus semifasciatus), which is currently the main target species of this fishery. In this circumstance, the decline in catche has provided opportunity for the population of Australian Blacktip Shark to recover. Although there is uncertainty regarding species composition and the magnitude of historical catches of Blacktip Sharks from Western Australia, harvests of Australian Blacktip Shark in this jurisdiction have been negligible since April 2009 [Molony et al. 2013], allowing the biomass to increase. 

A stock assessment was undertaken for the North Western Australia biological stock of Australian Blacktip Shark utilising a Stochastic Stock Reduction Analysis (SRA) model. The assessment estimated that in 2019 the harvest rate for Australian Blacktip Shark was 4 per cent of that required to reach MSY and that biomass was approximately 96 per cent of unfished levels [Usher et al. 2020]. The results of this assessment are supported by mark-recapture research undertaken for all species of Blacktip Shark in Northern Territory waters [Bradshaw et al. 2013]. This stock is not considered to be recruitment impaired and the current level of fishing is unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment impaired. 

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the North Western Australia biological stock of Australian Blacktip Shark is classified as a sustainable stock.

Toggle content

Biology

Blacktip Sharks biology [Harry, 2011, Harry et al. 2012, Last and Stevens 2009]

Biology
Species Longevity / Maximum Size Maturity (50 per cent)
Australian Blacktip Shark

Carcharhinus tilstoni: Females 15 years, males 13 years; 2 000 mm TL

C. tilstoni: 5–6 years; females 1 350–1 400 mm, males 1 200 mm TL

Toggle content

Distributions

Distribution of reported commercial catch of Australian Blacktip Sharks

Toggle content

Tables

Fishing methods
Western Australia Northern Territory Queensland New South Wales
Commercial
Gillnet
Beach Seine
Handline
Longline (Unspecified)
Line
Net
Indigenous
Spearfishing
Hook and Line
Various
Charter
Hook and Line
Recreational
Hook and Line
Management methods
Method Western Australia Northern Territory Queensland New South Wales
Charter
Bag limits
Gear restrictions
Licence (boat-based sector)
Possession limit
Spatial closures
Commercial
Catch limits
Effort limits
Effort limits (individual transferable effort)
Gear restrictions
Limited entry
Limited entry (licensing)
Maximum size limit
Possession limit
Processing restrictions
Quota
Spatial closures
Total allowable catch
Indigenous
Customary fishing management arrangements
No limits on customary catch
Recreational
Bag and boat limits
Bag limits
Gear restrictions
Licence (boat-based sector)
Maximum size limit
Possession limit
Spatial closures
Catch
Western Australia Northern Territory Queensland New South Wales
Commercial 36.97t
Charter Unknown
Indigenous Unknwon Unknown Unknown
Recreational No Australian Blacktip Shark caught from boats [Ryan et al. 2019], shore-based catches are undetermined Unknown Unknown

Western Australia – Recreational (Management methods) A recreational fishing from boat licence is required for recreational fishing from a powered vessel in Western Australia.

Queensland – Indigenous (management methods) for more information see https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/business-priorities/fisheries/traditional-fishing

New South Wales – Indigenous (Management Methods) https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/fishing/aboriginal-fishing

New South Wales commercial fisheries with less than seven active fishers are not presented due to the Privacy Act.

Recreational and Indigenous (catch) Given the offshore distribution of Sandbar Shark, near-shore catches are likely to be negligible.

Northern Territory – Indigenous (Management methods) The Fisheries Act 1988 (NT), specifies that “…without derogating from any other law in force in the Territory, nothing in a provision of this Act or an instrument of a judicial or administrative character made under it limits the right of Aboriginals who have traditionally used the resources of an area of land or water in a traditional manner from continuing to use those resources in that area in that manner”.

Northern Territory — Charter (Management methods) In the Northern Territory, charter operators are regulated through the same management methods as the recreational sector but are subject to additional limits on license and passenger numbers.

Toggle content

Catch Chart

Commercial catch of Blacktip Sharks - note confidential catch not shown

Toggle content

References

  1. Bradshaw, CJA, Field, IC, McMahon, CR, Johnson, GJ, Meekan, MG and Buckworth, RC (2013) More analytical bite in estimating targets for shark harvest. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 488: 221–232.
  2. de Faria, F 2012 Recreational fishing of sharks in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area: species composition and incidental capture stress, Masters thesis, James Cook University
  3. Harry, A, 2011, Life histories of commercially important tropical sharks from the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area, PhD thesis, James Cook University, Townsville.
  4. Harry, AV, Morgan, JAT, Ovenden, JR, Tobin, A, Welch, DJ and Simpfendorfer, C (2012) Comparison of the reproductive ecology of two sympatric Blacktip Sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus and Carcharhinus tilstoni) off north-eastern Australia with species identification inferred from vertebral counts. Journal of Fish Biology, 81: 1225–1233.
  5. Johnson, G.J, Buckworth, RC, Lee, H, Morgan, J AT, Ovenden, JR and McMahon, CR (2017) A novel field method to distinguish between cryptic carcharhinid sharks, Australian blacktip shark Carcharhinus tilstoni and common blacktip shark C. limbatus, despite the presence of hybrids. Journal of Fish Biology, 90, 1, 39–60.
  6. Last, PR and Stevens, JD (2009) Sharks and rays of Australia, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood.
  7. Leigh, GM , 2015, Stock assessment of whaler and hammerhead sharks (Carcharhinidae and Sphyrinidae) in Queensland, Agri-Science Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane.
  8. Molony, B, McAuley, R and Rowland, F (2013) Northern shark fisheries status report: Statistics only, in WJ Fletcher and K Santoro (eds) Status Reports of the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources of Western Australia 2012/13: The State of the Fisheries, Western Australian Department of Fisheries, Perth, 216–217.
  9. Morgan, JA, Harry, AV, Welch, DJ, Street, R, White, J, Geraghty, PT, Macbeth, WG, Tobin, A, Simpfendorfer, CA and Ovenden, JR (2011) Detection of interspecies hybridisation in Chondrichthyes: hybrids and hybrid offspring between Australian (Carcharhinus tilstoni) and common (C. limbatus) Blacktip Shark found in an Australian fishery. Conservation Genetics, 13: 455–463.
  10. Ovenden, JR, Street, R, Broderick, D, Kashiwagi, T and Salini, J (2007) Genetic population structure of Black-tip Sharks ( Carcharhinus tilstoni and C. sorrah) in northern Australia, in J Salini, R McAuley, S Blaber, RC Buckworth, J Chidlow, N Gribble, JR Ovenden, S Peverell, R Pillans, JD Stevens, I Stobutzki, C Tarca and TI Walker (eds), Northern Australian sharks and rays: the sustainability of target and bycatch species, phase 2, Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Cleveland, Queensland.
  11. QFish, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, www.qfish.gov.au
  12. Usher, M, Saunders, T and Braccini, M (2020) Stock Status Summary - 2020 Australian Blacktip Shark (Carcharhinus tilstoni) North and West Coast stock stochastic stock reduction analysis. Unpublished Fishery Report

Downloadable reports

Click the links below to view reports from other years for this fish.