Banana Prawn Penaeus merguiensis (formerly Fenneropenaeus merguiensis)1

James Larcombea, Mervi Kangasb and Brad Zellerc


White Banana Prawn
White Banana Prawn (P. Merguiensis)

Table 1: Stock status determination for White Banana Prawn

Jurisdiction

Commonwealth

Queensland

Western Australia

Stock

NPF

East coast

(ECIFFF, ECOTF, RIBTF)

EGPMF

NBPMF

KPMF

Stock status

         

Sustainable

Sustainable

Sustainable

Sustainable

Sustainable

Indicators

Catch, CPUE, trigger limits

Catch, stock assessments

Catch, catch projections

Catch, catch projections

Catch, catch projections


CPUE = catch per unit effort; ECIFFF = East Coast Inshore Fin Fish Fishery (Queensland); ECOTF = East Coast Otter Trawl Fishery (Queensland); EGPMF = Exmouth Gulf Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia); KPMF = Kimberley Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia); NBPMF = Nickol Bay Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia); NPF = Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth); RIBTF = River and Inshore Beam Trawl Fishery (Queensland)


Stock Structure

In Australia the standard fish name Banana Prawn is a group name which refers to Penaeus merguiensis and Penaeus indicus. The current chapter only considers Penaeus merguiensis. While it is not an agreed standard fish name Penaeus merguiensis is commonly referred to as White Banana Prawn. The biological stock structure of White Banana Prawn is uncertain. There is some evidence that there may be separate biological stocks of White Banana Prawn in the Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth); however, the boundaries of the biological stocks are unknown2. Stocks within Western Australia and Queensland are unlikely to be completely independent, although it does appear that biological stocks separated by large distances are more independent than adjacent biological stocks3. In the absence of clear information on biological stock structure, status is reported at the management unit level.


Stock Status

Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth) management unit

Recruitment of White Banana Prawns in the Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth) is thought to be largely determined by seasonal conditions, particularly rainfall4. As a result, a reliable stock–recruitment relationship has not been established. No formal stock assessment exists for this stock.

The harvest strategy for White Banana Prawns in the Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth) is designed for the capture of larger prawns and to allow for sufficient escapement to ensure adequate spawning biomass (based on historical data), preventing growth and recruitment overfishing, and providing higher returns by minimising the capture of small prawns. This is achieved through season-length, the end of which is dictated by catch-rate thresholds 5. The harvest strategy is designed to perform under conditions of substantial variation in biomass, which are largely independent of fishing. Although fishing mortality is thought to be high for White Banana Prawns in some years6, the species is thought to be resilient to fishing pressure.

In 2013, total reported commercial landings were 2713 tonnes (t); this is substantially below the landings in recent years and below the average catch of the preceding 10 years (2004 to 2013) of 4105 t. These catch levels indicate that a smaller than average biomass was available in 2013. Effort expended on White Banana Prawns in the Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth) in 2013 was 2192 vessel-days, less than the 10-year average (2002 to 2012) of approximately 2858 vessel-days.

The recent history of commercial catches of White Banana Prawns, which have been harvested in accordance with the harvest strategy and with a substantially reduced fishing fleet (compared with historical levels), indicates that the management unit is unlikely to be recruitment overfished7. The comparatively low effort indicates that fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the management unit to become recruitment overfished7.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.

East coast (Queensland) management unit

The most recent quantitative assessment of the east coast (Queensland) management unit was based on catch-and-effort data from 1988 to 2004, and estimated an average annual maximum sustainable yield (MSY) of 802 t3. Although there appears to be no long-term trend in total annual catch in relation to the MSY, there is evidence that the size of year-to-year variations may be increasing (for example, record high total catch in 2011, record low total catch in 2012 and the second highest total catch in 2013)8. From 2009 to 2013, annual catches have been variable in substocks where the majority (95 per cent) of the catch was taken8. The above evidence indicates the biomass of the management unit is unlikely to be recruitment overfished.

Although fishing mortality is likely to be at or near the upper sustainable limit for some substocks, recent ecological risk assessments found that there was a low risk of the management unit becoming recruitment overfished at 2009 effort levels9,10. Since 2009, there has been a 16 per cent decrease in effort directed at White Banana Prawn (days when White Banana Prawn was caught), indicating that, despite an increase in fishing power in the East Coast Otter Trawl Fishery fleet (0.4 to 3.1 per cent per year)11, fishing pressure on the management unit is not increasing. The above evidence indicates that the current level of fishing pressure is unlikely to cause the management unit to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.

Exmouth Gulf Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia) management unit

Banana Prawn landings are generally low (or zero) in this fishery, but in 2013 landings (74 t) were the highest recorded since the fishery started. This is likely to be attributable to favourable environmental conditions for White Banana Prawn (moderate rainfall in December–March for 3 years and warmer than average water temperatures). In 2012, a total of 33 t of White Banana Prawn was landed, indicating a higher than average abundance of spawning stock in that year. This is likely to have resulted in improved recruitment in 2013. The management unit is not considered to be recruitment overfished, and the current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the management unit to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.

Nickol Bay Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia) management unit

Historical commercial catch levels from 1989 to 1998 have been used as the basis for calculating target catch ranges. The target catch range is 40–220 t 12. Annual commercial catch projections for the fishing season are based on wet-season rainfall (December–March). The commercial catch projection for the 2013 fishing season was 120–180 t. Total commercial catch for 2013 was 106 t, which is within the target catch range but slightly below the 2013 projected catch range. Six boats fished in 2013, for a total effort of 178 vessel-days.

On the basis of annual trends in landings and effort since 1980 and, more recently, annual catch rates and the outputs of stock production models and a biomass dynamics model (unpublished work by the Western Australian Department of Fisheries), the White Banana Prawn stock in Nickol Bay is currently being fished at a sustainable level. Key evidence to support this is as follows:

  • There has been no marked declining trend in overall landings across the entire time series, despite very marked reductions in effort in recent years. Catches have typically fluctuated within the lower half of the catch target range.
  • Although catches have declined somewhat in recent years, the level of reduction is consistent with the level of effort reduction, according to the outputs of stock production models.
  • There has been no decline in peak catch rates in recent years in the two main fishing grounds.
  • There has been a declining trend in fishing mortality due to low fishing levels, as estimated by a biomass dynamics model.
  • In recent years, the levels of spawning biomass have been high relative to the estimated unfished level, as determined from the biomass dynamics model.

Therefore, the management unit is not considered to be recruitment overfished, and the current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the management unit to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.

Kimberley Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia) management unit

Historical commercial catch levels from 1989 to 1998 have been used as the basis for calculating target catch ranges. The range in the Kimberley Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia) is 200–450 t12. Annual commercial catch projections for the fishing season are based on January and February rainfall levels in Kalumburu and Derby, and the annual total landings12. The commercial catch projection for the 2013 fishing season was 230–350 t. Total commercial catch for 2013 was 144 t, which is well below the target catch range and projected catch range. The management unit operates under an upper-limit effort cap of 1500 vessel-days (based on historical effort levels); only 314 vessel-days were fished in 2013.

On the basis of annual trends in landings and effort since 1980 and, more recently, catch rates, the White Banana Prawn stock is currently being fished at a sustainable level. Key evidence to support this is as follows:

  • There has been no marked declining trend in landings across the entire time series.
  • Landings have been maintained at relatively low levels of effort compared with historical levels.
  • Fishing effort (vessel-days) in the past 5 years has been well below the levels that provided the highest catches in the history of the fishery.
  • In recent years, estimated levels of stock biomass have been high, and estimated levels of fishing mortality have been low, as determined from a preliminary biomass dynamic model.
  • There has been a marked increase in annual mean catch rates, apparently associated with a change in the economics of fishing since about 2005, which led to a marked reduction in the number of fishers harvesting the available stock.

The management unit is not considered to be recruitment overfished, and the current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the management unit to become recruitment overfished.

In the current economic conditions, fishers are aiming to optimise returns by maximising their efficiency (with the majority fishing only when catch rates are high), and targeting larger and higher-quality prawns (by fishing later in the year). These conditions are conducive to conservative harvesting of the resource. Permanent closures have been introduced in all the major rainfall catchments, as well as temporal closures in two of the catchment areas (known as 'size management fish grounds') to protect smaller prawns and their habitats.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the management unit is classified as a sustainable stock.


Table 2: White Banana Prawn biology2,3,12

Longevity and maximum size

1–2 years; >240 mm TL

Maturity (50%)

~6 months; 120–150 mm CL

CL = carapace length; TL = total length


Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of White Banana Prawn in Australian waters, 2013 (calendar year)
Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of White Banana Prawn in Australian waters, 2013 (calendar year)



Table 3: Main features and statistics for White Banana Prawn fisheries in Australia, 2013 (calendar year)

Jurisdiction

Commonwealth

Queensland

Western Australia

Fishing methods

Commercial

Otter trawl

Beam trawl

Mesh net

Recreationala

Cast netting

Indigenousb

Cast netting

Management methods

Commercial

Limited entry

Vessel restrictions

Gear restrictions

Effort limits

Spatial closures

Temporal closures

Recreationala

Licence

Bag limits

Possession limits

Indigenousb,c

Gear restrictions

Active vessels

52 in NPF

25 in ECIFFF

134 in ECOTF

45 in RIBTF

6 in EGPMF

12 in KPMF

6 in NBPMF

Catch

Commercial

2713 t in NPF

35 t in ECIFFF

1022 t in ECOTF

89 t in RIBTF

74 t in EGPMF

144 t in KPMF

106 t in NBPMF

Recreationala

Unknown

Unknown

Indigenousb,c

Unknown

Unknown

Markets

Domestic

Export


ECIFFF = East Coast Inshore Fin Fish Fishery; ECOTF = East Coast Otter Trawl Fishery (Queensland); EGPMF = Exmouth Gulf Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia); KPMF = Kimberley Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia); NBPMF = Nickol Bay Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia); NPF = Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth); RIBTF = River and Inshore Beam Trawl Fishery (Queensland)

a The Australian Government does not manage recreational fishing in Commonwealth waters. Recreational fishing in Commonwealth waters is managed by the state or territory immediately adjacent to those waters, under its management regulations.

b The Australian Government does not manage noncommercial Indigenous fishing in Commonwealth waters, with the exception of the Torres Strait. In general, noncommercial Indigenous fishing in Commonwealth waters is managed by the state or territory immediately adjacent to those waters.

c In Queensland, under the Fisheries Act 1994 (Qld), Indigenous fishers in Queensland are able to use prescribed traditional and noncommercial fishing apparatus in waters open to fishing. Size and possession limits, and seasonal closures do not apply to Indigenous fishers. Further exemptions to fishery regulations may be applied for through permits.


Figure 2: Commercial catch of White Banana Prawn in Australian waters, 1988 to 2013 (calendar years)
Figure 2: Commercial catch of White Banana Prawns in Australian waters, 2000–10 (calendar year)



Effects of fishing on the marine environment
  • The impact of trawling on habitats is managed in all jurisdictions. In Queensland, the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park occupies 63 per cent of the East Coast Otter Trawl Fishery13, 34 per cent of which is open to trawling8, but effort is highly aggregated, occurring within only a small fraction of the open area. South of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, the fishery operates in only 10 per cent of the area open to trawling 14. In Western Australia, extensive permanent and temporary closures result in the fleet operating in less than 30 per cent of the Exmouth Gulf, and less than 3 per cent of the north coast region. Fishing operations are restricted to areas of sand and mud, where trawling has minimal long-term physical impact15–18. The Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth) also uses a system of closures (spatial and seasonal) to manage the fishery, as well as other input controls (for example, limited entry, gear restrictions). A total of 2.1 per cent of the total managed area of the fishery is subject to permanent closures, and 8.3 per cent is subject to seasonal closures19.
  • Although the incidental capture of byproduct and bycatch species by trawling can lead to a range of indirect ecosystem effects20, studies in Queensland and Western Australia found no significant difference in biodiversity or overall distribution patterns of seabed biota between trawled and nontrawled areas18,21. An assessment of trawl-related risk in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park found that the East Coast Otter Trawl Fishery (Queensland) posed no more than an intermediate risk of overfishing species assemblages exposed to trawling9. Spatial contraction and/or temporal reduction in effort in these jurisdictions (see above) are likely to have mitigated the ecosystem impacts of trawling. Similarly, in the Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth), the ecological risk management report identifies priority species at high risk. However, no target or protected species have been assessed as high risk because of the fishery22.
  • The use of bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) in trawling can significantly reduce bycatch—by more than 50 per cent by weight in some fisheries 23. In the East Coast Otter Trawl Fishery (Queensland), the use of BRDs became mandatory in 1999, and the introduction of turtle excluder devices (TEDs) in 2001 largely eliminated capture of most large bycatch species, including turtles, sharks and rays24. BRDs and TEDs became mandatory in the Northern Prawn Fishery (Commonwealth) in 2001. Use of TEDs in the Northern Prawn Fishery reduced turtle bycatch from 5700 individuals per year (before 2001) to approximately 30 per year (after 2001)13. The introduction of TEDs in the Western Australian trawl fisheries in 2003 reduced turtle bycatch by at least 95 per cent25. BRDs and TEDs have been mandatory in the Exmouth Gulf Prawn Managed Fishery (Western Australia) since 2003 and in all northern Western Australian prawn fisheries since 2005. All prawn trawlers operating in Western Australia must use TEDs and BRDs, including secondary fish exclusion devices and hoppers to increase survival of returned fish. Commitment to continuous improvement in bycatch mitigation has facilitated increased use of best-practice TEDs and BRDs in the East Coast Otter Trawl Fishery (Queensland) since 2008. Recent ecological risk assessments of the fishery have acknowledged the reduced impact of trawling and a general absence of high risk of overfishing bycatch species 8,9.

Environmental effects on Banana Prawn
  • The abundance of prawns can be highly variable. It is influenced by environmental factors, including water temperatures, cyclones and broadscale oceanographic features4. For example, in Western Australia, cyclones can have either a positive or a negative impact on prawn biomass and availability. Early-season (December–January) cyclones can increase mortality of small prawns through the scouring of nursery areas, which destroys seagrass and algal habitat. Conversely, prawn mortality can decrease when water becomes turbid because predation is reduced23.
  • River flow as a result of rainfall is highly correlated with offshore commercial catches of banana prawns3,4. In the south-eastern Gulf of Carpentaria, it has been suggested that increased river flow has different effects on different stages of the White Banana Prawn life cycle: high flows can increase emigration of juveniles from estuaries; increased flows can prevent immigration, settlement and survival of post-larvae; and rainfall run-off may increase overall productivity, through the contribution of increased nutrient input to increased growth and survival rates3.
  • The 2013 catch was the second highest on record in the east coast (Queensland) management unit, almost all (98 per cent) of which was taken south of Mackay8. Clustering of high catches among neighbouring regional substocks is believed to be in response to major flooding of central and southern Queensland streams, following record rainfall associated with Tropical Cyclone Oswald in January 201326.



a Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
b Department of Fisheries, Western Australia
c Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Queensland