Tiger Flathead Neoplatycephalus richardsoni

Matthew Flooda, Geoffrey Ligginsb, Justin Bellc and James Andrewsd


Tiger Flathead from side
Tiger Flathead from above

Table 1: Stock status determination for Tiger Flathead

Jurisdiction

Commonwealth, New South Wales, Tasmania, Victoria

Stock

Southern Australian (ITF, OTF, SESSF [CTS], SF)

Stock status

 

Sustainable

Indicators

Spawning stock biomass, fishing mortality


ITF = Inshore Trawl Fishery (Victoria); OTF = Ocean Trawl Fishery (New South Wales); SESSF [CTS] = Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (Commonwealth Trawl Sector); SF = Scalefish Fishery (Tasmania)


Stock Structure

Tiger Flathead is endemic to Australia and distributed from northern New South Wales to western Victoria, including Tasmanian waters. There is some evidence of regional differences in physical characteristics, growth rates and spawning periods for Tiger Flathead, but biological stock structure has not been studied using genetic techniques. A single biological stock structure is assumed for management purposes1 and stock status is reported at this level.


Stock Status

Southern Australian biological stock

The most recent assessment2 estimated spawning stock biomass in 2014 to be 11 572 tonnes (t) or 50 per cent of the unfished (1915) level. The spawning biomass that supports maximum sustainable yield of Tiger Flathead was estimated to be 32 per cent of the unfished biomass. The biological stock is not considered to be recruitment overfished3.

The assessment shows notable increases in spawning stock biomass in the past 4 years2. In addition, the recommended biological catch (RBC) for Tiger Flathead for the 2011–12 fishing season was 3097 t4, and the total Australian commercial catch of Tiger Flathead in the 2012–13 fishing season was approximately 2976 t (2763 t Commonwealth; 181 t New South Wales; 31 t Tasmania; 1 t Victoria [financial year]). The RBC was not assessed for the 2012–13 fishing season3. This level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the biological stock to become recruitment overfished3.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a sustainable stock.


Table 2: Tiger Flathead biology1

Longevity and maximum size

20 years; males 500 mm SL, females 600 mm SL

Maturity (50%)

3 years; 300 mm SL

SL = standard length


Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of Tiger Flathead in Australian waters, 2013 (calendar year)
Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of Tiger Flathead in Australian waters, 2013 (calendar year)



Table 3: Main features and statistics for Tiger Flathead fisheries in Australia, 2013 (calendar year)

Jurisdiction

Commonwealtha

New South Walesa

Tasmaniaa

Victoriab

Fishing methods

Commercial

Danish-seine

Otter trawl

Hand line

Recreationalc

Rod and line

Indigenousd

Rod and line

Management methods

Commercial

Limited entry

Total allowable catch

Trip limit

Spatial closures

Gear restrictions

Recreationalc

Bag limits

Size limits

Spatial closures

Gear restrictions

Indigenousd,e,f,g

Bag limits

Size limits

Spatial closures

Gear restrictions

Section 37(1)(c1) Aboriginal cultural fishing authority

Active vessels

57 in SESSF [CTS]

48 in OTF

4 in SF

6 in ITF

Catch

Commercial

2763 t in SESSF [CTS]

181 t in OTF

31 t in SF

3 t in ITF

Recreationalc

Unknown

14.7 t (2007–08)6

Unknown

Indigenousd

Unknown

Unknown

None

Markets

Domestic

Export

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown


ITF = Inshore Trawl Fishery (Victoria); OTF = Ocean Trawl Fishery (New South Wales); SESSF [CTS] = Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (Commonwealth Trawl Sector); SF = Scalefish Fishery (Tasmania)

a Data provided for the Commonwealth, New South Wales and Tasmania align with the Commonwealth Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery 2012–13 fishing season (1 May 2012 – 30 April 2013).

b Data provided for Victoria align with the 2013 calendar year.

c The Australian Government does not manage recreational fishing in Commonwealth waters. Recreational fishing in Commonwealth waters is managed by the state or territory immediately adjacent to those waters, under its management regulations.

d The Australian Government does not manage noncommercial Indigenous fishing in Commonwealth waters, with the exception of the Torres Strait. In general, noncommercial Indigenous fishing in Commonwealth waters is managed by the state or territory immediately adjacent to those waters.

e In Victoria, regulations for managing recreational fishing are also applied to fishing activities by Indigenous people. Recognised Traditional Owners (groups that hold native title or have agreements under the Victorian Traditional Owner Settlement Act 2010) can apply for permits under the Fisheries Act 1995 that authorise customary fishing (for example, different catch and size limits, or equipment). The Indigenous category in Table 3 refers to customary fishing undertaken by recognised Traditional Owners. In 2012–13, there were no applications for customary fishing permits to access Tiger Flathead.

f The Aboriginal Fishing Interim Compliance Policy allows an Indigenous fisher in New South Wales to take in excess of a recreational bag limit in certain circumstances—for example, if they are doing so to provide fish to other community members who cannot harvest themselves.

g The Aboriginal cultural fishing authority is the authority that Indigenous persons can apply to to take catches outside the recreational limits under the New South Wales Fisheries Management Act 1994, section 37(1)(c1) (Aboriginal cultural fishing authority).


Figure 2: Commercial catch of Tiger Flathead in Australian waters, 1915 to 2013 (calendar years)
Figure 2: Commercial catch of Tiger Flathead in Australian waters, 1915 to 2013 (calendar years)



Effects of fishing on the marine environment
  • There can be a substantial level of bycatch in the fish trawl sector. In 2006, mandatory requirements for otter trawls to use 90 mm square-mesh codend panels were introduced to reduce the catch of small species and juvenile fish7.

  • Interactions also occur with animals protected under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, including marine mammals (dolphins, seals and sea lions), seabirds, some shark species and seahorses and pipefish (syngnathids). These interactions are reported quarterly by the Australian Fisheries Management Authority8 and on-board observer programs are used to validate the reporting in commercial logbooks.

  • In 2007, the South East Trawl Fishing Industry Association released an industry code of practice that aims to minimise interactions with fur seals, as well as addressing the environmental impacts of the fishery more generally9. Operators have developed other mitigation protocols that have further reduced seal mortalities, including using breakaway ties that keep the net closed until it is below depths that seals regularly inhabit, adopting techniques to close the trawl opening during recovery to minimise opportunities for seals to enter the net, switching off gantry lights that are not required during night trawling to avoid attracting bait species and seals, and dumping offal only when the boat is not engaged in deploying or hauling gear9.

  • In 2011, AFMA mandated individual vessel seabird management plans10. The seabird action plans are used in the Commonwealth Trawl Sector to mitigate the impacts of trawling on seabirds. Seabird mitigation measures include warp deflectors (‘pinkys’), bird bafflers (a system of ropes and PVC piping that protects the warp cable) and seal excluder devices.

  • The effects of trawl fishing on the marine environment are assessed through an environmental risk assessment and risk management framework and mitigated through spatial closures, and the implementation of bycatch and discard workplans in the Commonwealth Trawl Sector and Great Australian Bight Trawl Sector fisheries.

  • Danish-seine and otter trawl interact with a broad range of habitat types. However, an ecological risk assessment indicates that fishing operations on sandy substrates of the inner to mid shelf, where Tiger Flathead are targeted, do not present a high risk to habitats11,12.

  • Danish-seining has the potential to affect seahorses and pipefish (syngnathids) because Danish-seiners operate in relatively shallow waters and use nets with a small mesh size. An ecological risk assessment (ERA) indicated that the Spiny Pipehorse was at low risk because the fishery overlaps with only a small portion of the range of this species13.

  • Discarding of quota species can be significant in some parts of the Commonwealth Trawl Sector. However, discard rates for Tiger Flathead are low, generally around 5 per cent1.


Environmental effects on Tiger Flathead
  • There is some speculation that past peaks in abundance of Tiger Flathead may have been linked to favourable, but undetermined, environmental conditions14. Recent strong recruitment of small Tiger Flathead may have a similar environmental basis. However, the effect of long-term shifts in the marine environment, such as those associated with global climate change, cannot yet be predicted for the Tiger Flathead biological stock.



a Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
b Department of Primary Industries, New South Wales
c Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania
d Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Victoria