King George Whiting Sillaginodes punctatus

Paul Hamera, Anthony Fowlerb and Joshua Brownc


King George Whiting

Table 1: Stock status determination for King George Whiting

Jurisdiction

South Australia

Western
Australia

Victoria

Stock

Gulf St Vincent
(MSF)

Spencer Gulf
(MSF, NZRLF)

West coast–Eyre Peninsula (MSF, NZRLF)

Western Australia
(OA, SCEMF, WCDSIMF, WCEMF)

Victoria
(CIF, GLF, OF, PPBF)

Stock status

 

 

 

 

 

Transitional-depleting

Transitional-depleting

Sustainable

Sustainable

Sustainable

Indicators

Catch, CPUE, age structures, biomass

​Catch, CPUE, age structures, biomass

Catch, CPUE, age structures, biomass Catch, CPUE, recruitment trent, fishing mortality, per-recruit analysis Catch, CPUE, age and length structures, pre-recruit surveys


CIF = Corner Inlet Fishery (Victoria); CPUE = catch per unit effort; GLF = Gippsland Lakes Fishery (Victoria); MSF = Marine Scalefish Fishery (South Australia); NZRLF = Northern Zone Rock Lobster Fishery (South Australia); OA = Open Access (Western Australia); OF = Offshore Fishery (Victoria); PPBF = Port Phillip Bay Fishery (Victoria); SCEMF = South Coast Estuarine Managed Fishery (Western Australia); WCDSIMF = West Coast Demersal Scalefish (Interim) Managed Fishery (Western Australia); WCEIMF = West Coast Estuarine (Interim) Managed Fishery (Western Australia)


Stock Structure

The South Australian population of King George Whiting comprises three biological stocks1–3: Gulf St Vincent, Spencer Gulf and the west coast of the Eyre Peninsula. This delineation has been determined based on a detailed understanding of the species’ life history, including movement patterns of adult fish, location of spawning grounds and nursery areas1,2, and larval advection pathways and distances (based on early life history and hydrodynamic modelling)3. The biological stock structure in Victoria and Western Australia is unclear, but they are assumed to be separate single stocks for management purposes, and separate from the South Australian stocks. The biological stock structure of King George Whiting in southern Australia is currently under investigation using otolith chemistry and genetic techniques. The status of Victorian and Western Australian stocks is therefore reported at the jurisdictional level, whereas the status of the South Australian stocks is reported at the biological stock level.


Stock Status

In South Australia King George Whiting is the premium species in the multispecies Marine Scalefish Fishery, attracting the highest price per unit weight for commercial fishers. Assessment of the status of the South Australian stocks uses a weight-of-evidence approach that considers commercial catch-and-effort data, recreational fishery data, biological information on population size and age structures, and output from a computer fishery model that integrates these main input datasets. The primary indicators are hand-line effort and catch per unit effort (CPUE), and exploitation rate and biomass from the assessment model. The most recent assessment was completed in July 20142.  

Gulf St Vincent (South Australia) biological stock

The Gulf St Vincent biological stock is found throughout Gulf St Vincent and Investigator Strait, and around Kangaroo Island. Hand-line effort for this stock has declined since 2009, and hand-line CPUE has declined since 20072. Both of these declining trends for this species are consistent with a declining level of biomass, since, given the value of the species, it is expected that effort would remain high or consistent if biomass were available. The model-estimated biomass for this stock has been relatively flat for recent years. However, because the estimates of effort and CPUE used in the model did not take into account a likely increase in the ‘effective’ effort, and because of uncertainty in the time series of recreational catch and effort, the decline in fishable biomass is likely to have been greater than suggested by the model output. Although it is likely that the biomass of King George Whiting has declined between 2009 and 2013, the stock is not yet considered to be in a recruitment overfished state. However, the above evidence indicates that the current level of fishing pressure is likely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a transitional depleting stock.  

Spencer Gulf (South Australia) biological stock

The Spencer Gulf (South Australia) biological stock extends throughout the entire northern and southern regions of Spencer Gulf. Both catch and effort for this region have shown recent declining trends, culminating in the lowest recorded values for both in 20132. Furthermore, CPUE has declined for this region since 2007. As discussed above for the Gulf St Vincent stock, such trends in fishery statistics for this high-value species are consistent with a declining biomass. This is reflected in the model outputs, which indicate that there was a marginal decline in biomass between 2008 and 2013. Because the estimates of effort and CPUE used in the model did not take into account likely increases in ‘effective’ effort, and because of uncertainty in the time series of recreational catch and effort, the decline in fishable biomass may have been greater than suggested by the model output. Although declining slowly, the stock is not yet considered to be in a recruitment overfished state. However, the above evidence indicates that the current level of fishing pressure is likely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a transitional depleting stock.  

West coast—Eyre Peninsula (South Australia) biological stock

This biological stock extends throughout all the bays and offshore areas of the west coast of the Eyre Peninsula. Hand-line fishing effort for this stock was relatively stable in recent years. Catch increased for a number of years, and hand-line CPUE increased until 2013, reaching the highest level ever recorded2. Output from the stock assessment model showed trends of increasing recruitment rates and levels of biomass between 2004 and 2013. Furthermore, between 1984 and 2013, the exploitation rate fell considerably, relating to long-term declines in commercial and recreational fishing effort. The above evidence indicates that the biomass of this stock is unlikely to be recruitment overfished and that the current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the biomass to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a sustainable stock.

Western Australia

The life cycle of King George Whiting in Western Australia involves both inshore and offshore habitats; juvenile fish occupy near-shore waters in estuaries and protected coastal embayments before migrating to deeper waters as they mature (at around 40 cm), where they remain. Because of this offshore, size-related movement, it is difficult to obtain a representative sample of the age structure for the overall population to reliably estimate fishing mortality using traditional methods. A novel modelling approach was thus developed to produce estimates of fishing mortality that account for the offshore movement of this species4. These estimates were subsequently applied in a per-recruit analysis.

The status of the King George Whiting stock in Western Australia was recently assessed in 2013 using a weight-of-evidence approach that included estimates of fishing mortality and per-recruit analyses determined in the modelling approach, as well as commercial and recreational catch and catch rates, and fishery-independent juvenile recruitment indices5. Using age data collected during 2010 to 2012, fishing mortality for the King George Whiting breeding stock (offshore component) was estimated to be low (below the target fishing mortality [Ftarget]). At current estimated levels of fishing mortality for King George Whiting, the spawning potential ratio (based on the spawning biomass per recruit) was estimated to be at a sustainable level (42 per cent). Catch and catch-rate trends for the main commercial fisheries in Western Australia (South Coast Estuarine Managed Fishery and West Coast Estuarine [Interim] Managed Fishery) are confounded by environmental influences in these estuarine systems (for example, sandbar closing and opening). They are, however, within the historical range and are considered acceptable, as the data indicate no evidence of a declining stock biomass. Trends in recreational catch and catch rate are difficult to interpret because of the infrequent nature of the surveys, different designs of the surveys, and changes to size and bag limits. Annual trends in recruitment appear to correlate with trends in the recreational catch, with a time lag of 2–3 years. Annual recruitment by juvenile (age zero years) King George Whiting has been highly variable since recruitment surveys began in 1999. Recruitment levels were relatively high in 1999, 2000 and 2008 but were at more typical low levels in most other years. The high recruitment levels were observed during strong Leeuwin Current (La Niña) years. The above evidence indicates that the biomass of this stock is unlikely to be recruitment overfished.

The King George Whiting stock is exposed to relatively high fishing pressure on the inshore component of the stock, which is entirely comprised of immature fish. However, the breeding stock is offered some protection by its unidirectional offshore migration to deeper waters, where individuals tend to become more dispersed and less easily targeted. The current level of fishing mortality is unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence provided above, King George Whiting in Western Australia is classified as a sustainable stock.

Victoria

Stock status assessment of King George Whiting in Victoria uses a weight-of-evidence approach that considers CPUE from both the commercial and recreational sectors, fishery-independent annual surveys of pre-recruit (post-larval) catch rates in Port Phillip Bay, and age–length composition of the catch. Importantly, the indicator data are derived from bay and estuary fisheries that only target juvenile King George Whiting.

When describing the status of the Victorian King George Whiting stock, it is important to consider how life history characteristics influence the above indicators. The dynamics of King George Whiting populations and fisheries in Victorian bays and estuaries are strongly influenced by climatic factors that influence the numbers of larvae transported into the bay and estuary nursery grounds during spring each year6–8. Because King George Whiting leave these nursery areas permanently by 4–5 years of age (before adulthood), the fisheries in bays and estuaries are based on only a few age classes at any point in time (typically 2–4-year-olds)7,9. This means that the fisheries are highly variable in response to the variable supply of these larval stages. Over the past 60 years, King George Whiting fisheries production in Victoria’s bays and estuaries has shown peaks and troughs at approximately 10‑year intervals7,9.

The most recent formal stock assessment of Victorian King George Whiting was in 201010. Review of more recent commercial fisheries data (Port Phillip Bay Fishery and Corner Inlet Fishery) indicates that the King George Whiting fishery productivity and biomass (that is, catches and CPUE) have declined since the previous peak in 2011. This decline is within historical variability and is consistent with the low numbers of post-larvae observed by fishery-independent pre-recruit surveys from 2009 to 2012 in Port Phillip Bay. However, the pre-recruit survey in spring 2013 showed a major increase in the abundance of post-larvae recruiting in Port Phillip Bay. Therefore, while fishery production and biomass in Port Phillip Bay will continue to be lower than average, and will likely decline further in 2014–15, they are expected to increase significantly in 2015–16. The situation for the Corner Inlet Fishery is less certain, as pre-recruit surveys are not conducted for this location. Effort for all gear types in Victoria has decreased since 1999, as a result of the reduction in the number of licensed fishers in Victorian waters, and is at historically low levels. Further, consistent with the lower catches of King George Whiting in the Port Phillip Bay Fishery and Corner Inlet Fishery in recent years, effort with the main gear type, haul seines, has decreased.

The decline of catches and CPUE in recent years is consistent with environmental influences reducing larval supply to bays and estuaries in the previous 3–5 years. The recent poor post-larval recruitment of King George Whiting into the bay and inlet nursery areas, combined with fishing mortality and the natural movement of older King George Whiting to coastal waters, has led to the notable recent decline in catches and catch rates in the key fishery areas. However, the King George Whiting stock is exposed to relatively low fishing pressure in the offshore waters where the adults reside. The available information, along with consideration of the species’ life history, indicates that, although biomass has declined in the major bay and inlet fisheries, the biomass of the stock is unlikely to be recruitment overfished. The current level of fishing pressure is also unlikely to cause the stock to become recruitment overfished.

On the basis of the evidence above, King George Whiting in Victoria is classified as a sustainable stock.


Table 2: King George Whiting biology1,9–12

Longevity and maximum size

South Australia: 22 years; 590 mm TL
Western Australia: 14 years; 620 mm TL
Victoria: ≥6–11 years; 600 mm TL

Maturity (50%)

South Australia: 3–4 years; 300–350 mm TL
Western Australia: 3–4 years; 410 mm TL
Victoria: unknown


TL = total length


Table 3: Main features and statistics for King George Whiting fisheries in Australia, 2013 (calendar year)
Figure 1: Main features and statistics for King George Whiting fisheries in Australia, 2013 (calendar year)



Table 3: Main features and statistics for King George Whiting fisheries in Australia, 2013 (calendar year)

Jurisdiction

South Australia

Western Australia

Victoria

Fishing methods

Commercial

Hand line

Ring net

Gillnet

Anchored longline

Haul seine

Beach seine

Recreational

Rod and line

Hand line

Spearfishing

Indigenousa,b

Rod and line

Hand line

Spearfishing

Management methods

Commercial

Limited entry

Size limits

Spatial restrictions and closures (nets)

Temporal closures

Vessel restrictions

Gear restrictions

Recreational

Bag and boat limits

Size limits

Licensing (fishing from boat in Western Australia; recreational fishing in all waters in Victoria)

Indigenousa,b

Bag and boat limits

Size limits

Active vessels

244 in MSF

17 in NZRLF

20 in OA

21 in SCEMF

1 in WCDSIMF

4 in WCEIMF

18 in CIF

7 in GLF

11 in OF

32 in PPBF

Catch

Commercial

284 t in MSF

8.3 t in NZRLF

3 t in OA

9 t in SCEMF

<0.1 t in WCDSIMF

2 t in WCEIMF

37 t in CIF

0.1 t in GLF

2.2 t in OF

47 t in PPBF

Recreational

324 t (2007–08)12

26 t (2011–12)13

(boat based only)

155 t (2006–07)8,14

Indigenous

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

Markets

Domestic

Export


CIF = Corner Inlet Fishery (Victoria); GLF = Gippsland Lakes Fishery (Victoria); MSF = Marine Scalefish Fishery (South Australia); NZRLF = Northern Zone Rock Lobster Fishery (South Australia); OA = Open Access (Western Australia); OF = Offshore Fishery (Victoria); PPBF = Port Phillip Bay Fishery (Victoria); SCEMF = South Coast Estuarine Managed Fishery (Western Australia); WCDSIMF = West Coast Demersal Scalefish (Interim) Managed Fishery (Western Australia); WCEIMF = West Coast Estuarine (Interim) Managed Fishery (Western Australia)

a In Victoria, regulations for managing recreational fishing are also applied to fishing activities by Indigenous people. Recognised Traditional Owners (groups that hold native title or have agreements under the Victorian Traditional Owner Settlement Act 2010) are exempt (subject to conditions) from the requirement to hold a recreational fishing licence, and can apply for permits under the Fisheries Act 1995 that authorise customary fishing (e.g. different catch and size limits, or equipment). The Indigenous category in Table 3 refers to customary fishing undertaken by recognised Traditional Owners. In 2012–13, there were no applications for customary fishing permits to access King George Whiting in Victoria.

b
Subject to the defence that applies under section 211 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), and the exemption from a requirement to hold a recreational fishing licence, the non-commercial take by indigenous fishers is covered by the same arrangements as that for recreational fishing.


Figure 2: Commercial catch of King George Whiting in Australian waters, 2000 to 2013 (calendar years)
Figure 2: Commercial catch of King George Whiting in Australian waters, 2000 to 2013 (calendar years)



Effects of fishing on the marine environment
  • Some bycatch is expected from net or line fishing methods used to target King George Whiting. There has been one major study on the effects of haul-seine fishing on seagrass (fine leaf, eel grass, Zostera) habitat15. In that study, there was limited evidence of significant damage to seagrass beds by haul-net fishing, although the study had some limitations and recommended longer-term replicated studies involving industry, and studies on other seagrass species (that is, broad leaf, Posidonia)15. However, as a result of the targeted nature of the fishing and the methods used, the effects of fishing for King George Whiting on the marine environment are considered to be minor.

Environmental effects on King George Whiting
  • Historically, catch and catch rates in Victoria have followed an approximate 10-year cyclic pattern. Fluctuations in these biomass indicators are likely to result from environmental conditions affecting spawning success or, more likely, recruitment of the post-larval stages to the bay and estuary fishing areas from oceanic spawning areas to the west6. A significant relationship has been found between the strength of zonal westerly winds in south-eastern Australia and abundance of post-larvae recruiting into Port Phillip Bay, Victoria, during spring each year 6,9. The zonal westerly wind index has shown a long-term downward trend since about 1970, suggesting that the strength of the westerly wind flow over Victoria has decreased over the past 40 years. The decline in zonal westerly winds is consistent with the prediction that westerly winds will weaken in southern Australia under climate change because of a southward migration of the high-latitude westerly wind belt south of Australia16. This may ultimately have a significant impact on the average abundance of larvae that enter Victoria’s bays and inlets.

  • Although westerly winds6 and oceanic water temperatures17 during the winter larval dispersal phase play an important role in determining recruitment patterns to the bay and estuary fisheries, the availability of suitable nursery habitat—primarily seagrass18—is another critical factor that could influence survival and growth of the young fish, and therefore fisheries productivity. Significant long-term loss of seagrass habitat in bays and estuaries would affect production of this species.

  • In other states, as in Victoria, annual recruitment by juvenile King George Whiting is highly variable, most likely as a result of various complex interactions with the environment, on both broad and local scales. In Western Australia, relatively strong recruitment occurred in 1999, 2000 and 2008, which coincided with a strong Leeuwin Current in these years. The warm water temperatures associated with this southward-flowing current may have led to increased larval growth and survival rates.



a Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Victoria
b South Australian Research and Development Institute
c Department of Fisheries, Western Australia