Table 1: Stock status determination for Sandbar Shark
Jurisdiction |
Western Australia, Northern Territory |
New South Wales, Queensland |
Stock |
Western Australian
(JASDGDLF, ONLF, WCDGDLF) |
Eastern Australian
(ECIFFF, OTLF) |
Stock status |
↑ |
|
Transitional–recovering |
Undefined |
Indicators |
Catch, CPUE, fishing mortality |
Catch |
CPUE = catch per unit effort; ECIFFF = East Coast Inshore Fin Fish Fishery (Queensland); JASDGDLF = Joint Authority Southern Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Managed Fishery (Western Australia); ONLF = Offshore Net and Line Fishery (Northern Territory); OTLF = Ocean Trap and Line Fishery (New South Wales); WCDGDLF = West Coast Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Fishery (Western Australia)
Sandbar Shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus) occurs off both the east and west coasts of Australia, from approximately 17°S to 32°S latitude off the east coast, and 13°S to 36°S latitude off the west coast1,2. In addition to genetic analysis that suggests limited gene flow between eastern and western C. plumbeus3, there are limited recorded catches in the Gulf of Carpentaria and southern Australia. Thus, the species is considered to be represented by separate eastern and western biological stocks in Australian waters. Status is reported at the level of these biological stocks.
Western Australian biological stock
In Western Australia, Sandbar Shark is targeted by the West Coast Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Fishery, and taken in lesser quantities by the Joint Authority Southern Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Managed Fishery4. It was also previously targeted by the Western Australian North Coast Shark Fishery5. The Western Australian stock assessment uses current and historical data from all of these fisheries. Minor catches historically reported from the Offshore Net and Line Fishery (Northern Territory) are assumed to be from the western biological stock, but these are not explicitly included in assessments of this stock.
Because of the longevity of Sandbar Shark and the age-specific nature of targeted fishing mortality, a sufficiently long time series of catch-per-unit-effort data is not yet available for dynamic stock assessment modelling. Assessment of this stock has therefore been undertaken using empirically derived estimates of fishing mortality between 2001 and 2004, and demographic modelling techniques6,7.
Demographic modelling indicated that combined levels of fishing mortality in Western Australian targeted shark fisheries, nontarget commercial fisheries and the recreational fishing sector became increasingly unsustainable between 2001 and 2004 (when catches peaked at 918 tonnes [t]) and had probably exceeded sustainable levels since 1997–98. These conclusions are supported by fishery-independent survey data that indicated declining breeding stock abundance between 2002 and 20055,6.
Since 2010, Sandbar Shark catches have remained well below the levels that will allow a gradual recovery of the breeding stock. The expected reductions in recruitment from previously excessive exploitation of the breeding stock are likely to be ameliorated by significant reduction in targeted fishing effort. Therefore, although the breeding stock is considered to be close to the minimum acceptable limit (40 per cent of unfished biomass), current levels of fishing are considered suitably precautionary to ensure the recovery of this biological stock.
On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as a transitional–recovering stock.
Eastern Australian biological stock
In New South Wales, whaler sharks (Carcharhinus spp.), including Sandbar Shark (C. plumbeus), have historically not been adequately identified and reported at a species level in commercial catch logbooks. However, observer data indicate that Sandbar Shark represents the largest single-species component of catches in the Ocean Trap and Line Fishery (New South Wales), at 35 per cent of the overall shark catch8. Insufficient information is available to determine status for any of the whaler shark species in New South Wales, including Sandbar Shark9. The net fishery of the East Coast Inshore Fin Fish Fishery (Queensland) contributes minimal quantities (less than 2 t per year) to the overall eastern Australian harvest of Sandbar Shark.
On the basis of the evidence provided above, the biological stock is classified as an undefined stock.
Table 2: Sandbar Shark biology2,11,10
Longevity and maximum size |
~30–40 years; 1660 mm FL; 2150 mm TL |
Maturity (50%) |
Females: 16.2 years; 1360 mm FL Males: 13.8 years; 1270 mm FL |
FL = fork length TL = total length
Figure 1: Distribution of reported commercial catch of Sandbar Shark in Australian waters, 2013 (calendar year)
Table 3: Main features and statistics for Sandbar Shark fisheries in Australia, 2013 (calendar year)
Jurisdiction |
Western Australia |
Northern Territory |
New South Wales |
Queensland |
Fishing methods |
Commercial |
Demersal gillnet |
✓ |
|
|
✓ |
Demersal longline |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Pelagic gillnet |
|
✓ |
|
|
Recreational |
Rod and line |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Hand line |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Indigenousa |
|
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Management methods |
Commercial |
Limited entry |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Effort limits |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
Gear restrictions |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Spatial closures |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Possession restrictions |
✓ |
|
|
✓ |
Processing restrictions |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
Total allowable commercial catch |
|
|
|
✓ |
Vessel restrictions |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
Recreational |
Bag limits |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
Possession limits |
|
|
|
✓ |
Gear restrictions |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Indigenousa–d |
Gear restrictions |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Bag limits |
|
|
✓ |
|
Section 37(1)(c1), Aboriginal cultural fishing authority |
|
|
✓ |
|
Active vessels |
|
12 in JASDGDLF
5 in WCDGDLF |
7 in ONLF |
12 in OTLF |
1 in ECIFFF |
Catch |
Commercial |
25 t in JASDGDLF
16 t in WCDGDLF |
<1 t in ONLF |
5.6 t in OTLF |
<1 t in ECIFFF |
Recreational |
<10 t retention of all whaler sharks caught from boats12
Shore-based catches are likely to be negligiblee |
Unknown but likely to be negligiblee |
Unknown but likely to be negligiblee |
Unknown but likely to be negligiblee |
Indigenous |
Unknown but likely to be negligiblee |
Unknown but likely to be negligiblee |
Unknown but likely to be negligibleb,c,e |
Unknown but likely to be negligiblee |
Markets |
Domestic |
✓ |
✓ |
n/a |
✓ |
Export |
✓ |
✓ |
n/a |
✓ |
ECIFFF = East Coast Inshore Fin Fish Fishery (Queensland); JASDGDLF = Joint Authority Southern Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Managed Fishery (Western Australia); n/a = not available; ONLF = Offshore Net and Line Fishery (Northern Territory); OTLF = Ocean Trap and Line Fishery (New South Wales); WCDGDLF = West Coast Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Fishery (Western Australia)
a In Queensland, under the Under the Fisheries Act 1994 (Qld), Indigenous fishers in Queensland are able to use prescribed traditional and noncommercial fishing apparatus in waters open to fishing. Size and possession limits, and seasonal closures do not apply to Indigenous fishers. Further exemptions to fishery regulations may be applied for through permits.
b The Aboriginal Fishing Interim Compliance Policy allows an Indigenous fisher in New South Wales to take in excess of a recreational bag limit in certain circumstances—for example, if they are doing so to provide fish to other community members who cannot harvest themselves.
c The Aboriginal cultural fishing authority is the authority that Indigenous persons can apply to to take catches outside the recreational limits under the New South Wales Fisheries Management Act 1994, section 37(1)(c1) (Aboriginal cultural fishing authority).
d Subject to the defence that applies under section 211 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), and the exemption from a requirement to hold a recreational fishing licence, the non-commercial take by indigenous fishers is covered by the same arrangements as that for recreational fishing.
e Given the offshore distribution of Sandbar Shark, near-shore catches are likely to be negligible.

Figure 2: Commercial catch of Sandbar Shark in Australian waters, 1998 to 2013 (calendar years)
- Recent analysis of potential changes in ecosystem structure of finfish in the South and West Coast Bioregions of Western Australia13 found no evidence of any systematic change in species diversity or richness, or trophic index, indicating that this fishery is not having a material impact on the food chain or trophic structure.
- The demersal gillnets used to catch Sandbar Shark in Western Australia are deployed infrequently over a small proportion of the target fisheries’ operational area. Under normal circumstances, the physical impact of the gear on the bottom is minimal3.
- Demersal gillnets are known to interact with a number of threatened and protected species in areas where they are used to catch Sandbar Shark. However, such interactions occur at a very low frequency, and have been assessed as posing low to negligible risks to these populations4.
- Climate change and climate variability have the potential to impact fish stocks in a range of ways, including influencing their geographic distribution (for example, latitudinal shifts in distribution). However, the impact of environmental changes on Sandbar Shark stocks is unknown.
a Department of Fisheries, Western Australia
b Department of Primary Industries, New South Wales
c Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Queensland
d Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, Northern Territory